Prompting Chat GPT to the answer questions on what the existing A.I and automation systems has achieved and what should follow from then going forward...
Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, can play a significant role in redefining automated literature reviews by offering several benefits and capabilities. Here are a few ways in which generative AI can contribute to automated literature reviews:
Efficient Extraction of Relevant Information: Generative AI models can analyze vast amounts of text data and extract relevant information efficiently. They can identify key concepts, extract important findings, and summarize large volumes of literature into concise and meaningful representations.
Natural Language Understanding and Generation: Generative AI models are trained on a wide range of textual data, enabling them to understand and generate human-like text. They can comprehend complex research articles and generate coherent responses or summaries based on the input provided.
Synthesis of Information: Generative AI models can synthesize information from multiple sources and present a comprehensive overview. They can identify common themes, extract insights, and generate cohesive summaries that consolidate findings from various studies.
Contextual Recommendations: Generative AI models can provide contextual recommendations based on the user's input or research requirements. They can suggest relevant papers, highlight related work, or offer insights into emerging trends and areas of study.
Language Translation and Cross-Domain Analysis: Generative AI models can facilitate cross-domain analysis by translating research articles from one language to another. This capability enables researchers to access a broader range of literature and gain insights from different language sources.
Assistance in Decision-Making: Generative AI models can assist researchers in making informed decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations. They can help identify knowledge gaps, suggest potential research directions, or offer insights into the significance and impact of specific findings.
Collaboration and Interaction: Generative AI models can facilitate collaborative efforts by enabling interactive conversations. Researchers can engage in dialogue with the model, seek clarifications, ask follow-up questions, and explore ideas, thus enhancing the interactive and iterative nature of literature reviews.
It is important to note that while generative AI models like ChatGPT can provide valuable assistance, they should be used as tools to augment the work of researchers rather than replace human expertise. Researchers should exercise critical judgment, validate the generated outputs, and combine them with their own domain knowledge and understanding.
Would like to point out one fact: Generative AI has the ability to take the big picture as it has more access to many sources of information, compared to us. Hence it is a good tool to come up with general descriptions and summaries. However these also might try to fabricate the references as well-hence references can be wrong. So it's a must to validate the facts generated by AI tools before we use them.
Chapa Sirithunge of course one can't expect scholars to rely on generative AI to create new knowledge and/or identify gap in the literature. However, using these as a prompts does enable scholars to access quick information needed and indeed a summary?
I think these Generative AI tools are here to stay and scholars are beginning to reflect on how these can be best used by students, lecturers, tutors and managers.
Furthermore, I think to be able to use these tools with integrity and honesty will prevent any issues with references.
Do you think scholars to be upskilled to use these tools so to able to support other stakeholders such as students and managers?