The output includes results for PGLS at a given alpha value, Felsenstein's independent contrasts and TIPS (where phylogeny is not accounted for). In my case, mean PGLS carries high alpha values and both FIC and TIPS have alpha values of 0. Should I simply focus on the PGLS and treat the others as hypothetical scenarios? Should I use the PGLS alpha as my guide for acceptance/rejection of the other two? Or alternatively, should trust be given to the set with the highest likelihood? Also am I correct in stating that R^2 measures the extent to which phylogeny accounts for the observed correlation?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing
More Sam Moran's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions