Many physicists and mathematicians assume that mother nature has two distinct languages, one for macroscopic objects in classical physics and the second for microscopic subatomic objects which is Schrödinger's PDE and its derivatives.
Moreover, the old iron guards of SE believe that these two languages reduce to a single one which is the solution of SE, assuming that eventually it can deal with macroscopic objects (Via SE has no scales and principle of Correspondence).
The question is valid:
Does it make sense for a macroscopic quantity (time) to appear in a microscopic equation (SE) unless SE itself is a statistical equation?
Conversely, we assume that nature has only one language to speak to itself, namely the physical B-matrix statistical chains capable of solving the classical heat diffusion equation and Schrodinger's quantum PDE in a 3D configuration space.
Strikingly, the closed, empty 3D box has its own statistics, even without any energy density fields inside.
A striking example of the above statement appears in limited mathematical integrations:
I= ∫ y dx from x=a to x=b,
I=∫∫ W(x,y) dx dy from x=a to x=b and y=b to y=c.
..etc..
while they can be calculated precisely thanks to the transition chains of the matrix B[1].
1-Effective unconventional approach to statistical differentiation and statistical integration
November 2022
Many physicists and mathematicians assume that mother nature has two distinct languages, one for macroscopic objects in classical physics and the second for microscopic subatomic objects which is Schrödinger's PDE and its derivatives.
Moreover, the old iron guards of SE believe that these two languages reduce to a single one which is the solution of SE, assuming that eventually it can deal with macroscopic objects (Via SE has no scales and principle of Correspondence).
The opposite is true:
The Schrödinger equation is only a subset of modern probability classical mechanics.
SE itself is a probability conservation equation!
We assume that nature has only one language to speak to itself, namely the physical statistical chains of the B matrix capable of solving the classical heat diffusion equation and the quantum Schrödinger PDE in a configuration space 3D.
It is striking that the closed, empty configuration bounded in 1D, 2D and 3D has its own probability and statistics, even without any energy density field inside.
A striking example of the above statement appears in limited mathematical integrations:
I= ∫ y dx from x=a to x=b, . . . . (1),
I=∫∫ W(x,y) dx dy from x=a to x=b and y=b to y=c. . . . . (2)
..etc..
Equations 1,2 can be calculated numerically and precisely via the transition chains of the matrix B[1] by applying the so-called statistical weights,
I{1D,7 nodes}=6 h /77(6*Y1 +11* Y2 + 14* Y3+15* Y4 +14* Y5 + 11*Y6 + 6*Y7). . . . (1*)
I{2.9 nodes}= 9 h^2 /29.5
2.75 3.5 2.75
3.5 4.5 3.5
2.75 3.5 2.75
(Y11,Y12,Y13,Y21,Y22,Y23,Y31,Y32,Y3) .. . . (2*)
NOW, believe it or not, equations 1*,2* are exactly the numerical statistical solution for ψ(r)^2 in the time-independent Schrödinger PDE.
[1]Effective unconventional approach to statistical differentiation and statistical integration, Researchgate, IJISRT journal, November 2022.
Hi dears، please write down some more reason regarding the above mentioned suggestions. Since is not clear and need some more logical and mathematical reason. Regards, Murteza
This short answer is simply to clarify to our colleague Professor Murteza the question and his answer and to thank him for his helpful suggestions:
1-We admit that the answer above is not clear enough and requires some logical and mathematical clarification.
2-We believe that your request also requires additional clarification.
Please write your answer/question in sheet music form, i.e.:
1-What is the origin of.,.
2-Why is this term...
3-How to derive/apply...
etc..
And we will do our best to respond as soon as we receive your inquiries.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Control Theory