I believe concepts/theories( ideologies) rather shape “what people should think” and not how people should think.

Theories are important benchmarks describing the realities of the world scientifically by creating a global discourse involving scientists from various disciplines. Such an engagement and interaction is a prerequisite to thinking innovatively.

Subsequent postulation in a system comprised of multiple ideologies is argued by Hegel to bring an eventual conclusion between at least two competing parties (ideologies), where either one party provides sound proof of concept, or both parties lose their stance and conclude to a higher truth. In order to prove or disprove one's postulations in a system of discourse, warranted yet unforeseen information must be accommodated and consequently synthesized and evaluated to remain the superior ideology. This perpetual process of accommodation and synthesis/evaluation of new and unorthodox concepts theoretically breeds innovation. A peculiarity of this is when a member of a party has a revolutionary innovative concept that makes it fundamentally different from it's original party - which in itself fosters further discourse, and in essence further innovation.