model of passivity ( which i and D.D.Macdonald follow are poor xerox of the model of T.P.Hoar); If you access see the book by J.M.west on "corrosion processes and electro deposition"
no doubt you see the book by H.H.Uhlig ( see my book on modern advances in corrosion and its control with prof S.N.Banejee)
As for technique to see breakdown of passivity SEM is enough - I explain in simpler terms -Chlorides adsorb on the M-O weak sites, form chloro hydroxy metal soluble complexes - Insoluble complexes follow time dependent passivity - pit weak nucleate and grow at weaker sites - you can follow pit propagation currents using AVRAMI'S equations -See TWO and three dimensional growth equations used in Electrocystallisation
As you know SEM-EDX, powder XRD, and more specifically XPS techniques are helpful for analysis of different corrosion products formed on metal surface. XPS will be very helpful to determine the valencies of metal and other elements. By knowing corrosion products formed and oxidation states of the elements by using this techniques only we can predict the mechanism. By considering our personal examination and results only we have to demonstrate the mechanism, instead of simply looking at literature. Ofcorse Literature reports are also helpful to support our results. But what we consider is our experimental approach and results.
We are yet to do something different from what is known earlier-we agree with them --only we do not differ - characterization techniques are like witnesses - some may be for or against - they are not actual players--