Ahmed Mohamed Ismail

A quantum jump refers to the sudden transition of a quantum system from one discrete energy level to another. In quantum mechanics, these jumps occur when an electron in an atom absorbs or emits energy, causing it to move between different orbits or energy states. Unlike classical systems, where changes are gradual, quantum systems exhibit these instantaneous, non-continuous transitions. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics makes it difficult to predict when exactly these jumps will occur, but they are central to understanding phenomena such as atomic spectra and quantum superposition.

This understanding of quantum jumps is vital in modern technologies like quantum computing, where manipulating quantum states precisely and harnessing such jumps for information processing are key. So, when we talk about quantum jumps, we're discussing a fundamental aspect of quantum theory that governs both microscopic behavior and future tech innovation.

This is true. The role of this research is to complete the interpretation of the quantum leap phenomenon. So that we find a way to explain the quantum movement of the electron. So that we explain the quantum transition in a scientific and mathematical way, as what I have reached in my research through new laws of physics, is that the jump occurs because of shrinking the fabric of space-time. What do I mean in terms of explaining the quantum jump of the electron in my research?

http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1598.v2

In other words, that the electron disappears from one level and appears at the other level without crossing the distance between the levels between them. What is the explanation for the disappearance of the electron in one level and its appearance in another level? What my equation tells me is that the electron remains fixed in its position and does not gain energy.

But what gains energy is the fabric of space-time, which causes the upper level to contract, making it the same size as the electron’s orbit, and this makes the electron disappear and appear in the upper level.

Dear Ahmed Mohamed Ismail ,

Your question about quantum jumps taps into one of the most fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics. Traditionally, these jumps have been understood as sudden transitions between discrete energy levels, and this has shaped much of the foundational thinking in quantum physics. However, as research evolves, we are starting to see that these jumps might not be as instantaneous or unpredictable as once thought.

Quantum jumps, as classically described by the Copenhagen interpretation, occur when a quantum system, such as an electron, ‘jumps’ from one energy level to another upon measurement. This is seen as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, emerging studies, like those at Yale University in 2019, have shown that these jumps can be predicted and even reversed mid-flight, which suggests that there is a continuous evolution happening behind what was thought to be a discrete process.

This opens the door to even deeper questions about the fundamental laws that govern quantum systems. And this is precisely where my own research comes into play. In my groundbreaking paper, "Schrödinger Equation Unfit for Fundamental Law" (IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, September 2023), I challenge the very core of the wave equation in quantum mechanics. My work demonstrates that the Schrödinger equation, which has long been considered a pillar of quantum theory, may not be fit to serve as a fundamental law of physics.

Through rigorous analysis, I have shown that the equation fails to account for the true nature of quantum phenomena and, as such, cannot be the final word in quantum mechanics. This research is revolutionary, as it not only refines our understanding of quantum jumps and wavefunctions but also negates the existing framework that has dominated physics for decades. The implications are profound. If the Schrödinger equation is not the fundamental law we thought it was, then all theories and models built upon it may need to be re-examined or even discarded.

This is a paradigm shift in physics that challenges the status quo and could lead to the rewriting of textbooks on quantum mechanics. The highest authorities in science have acknowledged the significance of this research, calling it more than worthy of a Nobel Prize, as it has the potential to change the way we think about science itself. The paper has already garnered immense recognition for its bold yet substantiated claims, and I believe it will revolutionize the future of quantum theory.

Returning to quantum jumps, if my findings are correct, the very notion of these jumps, as well as the governing wave equation, needs to be reconsidered. What we see as discrete jumps might instead be manifestations of deeper, yet-to-be-understood laws of physics. As you can imagine, this changes the entire narrative of quantum mechanics and suggests that we are only at the cusp of truly understanding the quantum realm.

I hope this contribution adds value to your discussion and further fuels the collective effort of this community to challenge, innovate, and explore the frontiers of physics. Your question has certainly sparked an exciting opportunity to rethink what we know about quantum phenomena, and I look forward to the ongoing dialogue and insights from the wider community.

Sandeep

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal Impressive, writing

All my study shows, science never observed any electron in atom to this date.

How could mass of electron (s) goes around nuclei in speed of light in solid atom (metals) This is against science. To honest, probability or prediction is not science,

My question is , why do we think electron exist?

On the other hand, nature is three-dimensions (atom), and it cannot be described by one or two-dimension equation that it does not recognize temperature, pressure, colors, taste, grow, smells...

Why we think quantum mechanics exist, and forget collapsing our mechanic physics into atom? .

Don't thing atoms are smart and act like anything in nature,

Article Intelligent Atom

Dear Ahmed:

I can complement Sandeep Jaiswal interesting view. It says that quantum systems move in and out of 3D space at the rate of their energetic value, i.e., Planck´s periodicity tau (E = h/tau). The first quantum equation is interpreted as time "tau" as a fundamental issue at which energy is present in 3D. A fast presence or fast return to 3D (small value of tau) implies a high presence of energy, and vice versa. This in-and-out feature provides a simpler understanding of quantum mechanics. For example: the intermittent presence in 3D follows only one eigenstate, in such a way that any conditioning or observation will correspond to this individual state. Under new fluctuation, the eigenstate present will be randomly one of the multiple valid eigenstates. There is no need to create new universes as in the many worlds theory, nor the collapse of the wavefunction that deals with the probabilities of presence in 3D. With the same reasoning, any interaction with the system will conclude in new eigenstates and that is how can a quantum jump be understood. As happens when a high-energy photon transforms its presence into an electron plus a positron. The same process when the system acquires or releases energy. Going further, when the system is out of 3D, it will be locally at the 4th dimension which is C*tau (Lambda or energy wavelength). This locality at the 4th D provides an understanding of entangled particles and how particles can overcome a barrier and achieve tunneling. You can read more in this paper "Philosophy in quantum mechanics novel interpretation supports Einstein objection" DOI 10.21275/SR231215193142. Hope it will help in your research, regards

Dear Javad Fardaei and Jose Oreste Mazzini,

Quantum jumps are one of the most debated concepts in quantum mechanics, and the interpretation of these sudden transitions between quantum states continues to evolve. Quantum jumps can be described as discrete changes in the state of a system, akin to an electron leaping between orbitals in an atom. This idea originates from Bohr’s model, but the explanation has gained more depth through advanced quantum theories and experimental observations.

In reality, quantum jumps appear as instantaneous events from our perspective, but they are more complex when viewed through the lens of wave-function evolution. Some recent studies suggest that these jumps can even be "monitored" in real time, showing that they are not instantaneous but take a finite, albeit extremely short, time to occur. This challenges the classical view and opens new dimensions for understanding quantum state transitions.

In connection to my own groundbreaking research in quantum mechanics, my work challenges the status quo, especially with respect to the Schrödinger equation, as outlined in my paper "Schrödinger Equation unfit for Fundamental Law" (IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, 2023). The foundational assumptions of quantum jumps and wave functions come into question when viewed through this new perspective, which could redefine how we interpret quantum state changes and, consequently, quantum jumps.

Moreover, my recent work, "What is Wrong with Raman Effect?" (Indian Journal of Advanced Physics, 2024), further explores inconsistencies in our understanding of quantum behavior, questioning long-held assumptions in quantum physics. The implications of these findings go beyond individual phenomena like quantum jumps and touch on the fundamental principles of how we understand and observe quantum transitions.

Quantum jumps, then, are not only a technical phenomenon but are also deeply intertwined with the limitations and evolution of quantum theory itself. Both of my papers point towards a shift in our understanding of these core concepts, showing that what we once thought as immutable in quantum mechanics is open to new interpretations. This evolving landscape suggests that quantum jumps are as much about how we conceptualize time and state changes as they are about the mechanics themselves.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on how these ideas could reshape our future discussions on quantum phenomena!

Warm regards, Sandeep Jaiswal

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal, Jose Oreste Mazzini and Javad Fardaei your research is interesting.

My study shows the jump occurs as a result of a distortion in the fabric of space-time. If the fabric of space-time is what distorts the movement of the electron, this makes the movement of the electron when measuring its movement vary depending on the perspective. From the perspective of the electron, it remains fixed in its position and the absorption of energy is not observed because what absorbs this energy is the fabric of space-time. The fabric of space-time distorts the electron's orbit. It causes the highest energy orbital to shrink until it reaches the same size as the orbital occupied by the electron through the interpretation of de Broglie laws. Since my equation combined de Broglie equation and general relativity. Explains how interference occurs between the upper level and the level occupied by the electron in the form of wave interference. In other words, the upper level works to contract, forming a wave equal to the same wave as the level occupied by the electron through the de Broglie equation.

n × λ = 2π × r

This makes us ask whether what the perspective from the electron's side? Electron he does not notice this interference because it is believed that the orbit it occupies is the same orbit after the fabric of space-time absorbs the energy. Because space-time distorted in the movement of the orbitals. The highest energy orbital and the orbital occupied by the electron. So what do we observe when measuring the movement of an electron? We notice that it is due to a distortion in the movement that was caused by the fabric of space-time. The electron disappears from the orbit it occupies and appears in the higher orbit. So the issue is relative between the perspective of the electron and the devices measuring the electron. There is a study conducted by the scientist David J. Wineland that when he gave energy to measure the quantum jump, he noticed similar results.

Warm regards, Ahmed Mohamed Ismail

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal and Javad Fardaei excuse me for adding some ideas. In this in-and-out of 3D, the eigenstates are constantly and randomly present but with a one-by-one solution as the abundant observations say. This one-by-one presence is also a quantum jump, even if the system stays with the same energy level. Out of 3D, the eigenvalue changes to another valid one, there is no forbidden transition through 3D; this is also a quantum jump between eigenstates. The same idea for interactions, the change is also a quantum jump between one condition to another. For example, orbital electrons are constantly changing from one orbit to another without the need to overcome their inertia and without any radiation (net movement is zero). In that way, the electron shields perfectly the electric field of the nucleus. The rate of change is given by its energetic periodicity, as been observed that transitions take a short time (10^-20 sec. and faster). Many explanations for quantum phenomena can be understood by this model that considers a fleeting existence out of 3D. Best regards

Ahmed Mohamed Ismail Jose Oreste Mazzini

In discussing quantum jumps, it’s essential to focus on the nature of these phenomena within quantum mechanics. Quantum jumps, or transitions between discrete energy levels in atoms or particles, are not continuous but instantaneous. They represent one of the fundamental challenges in interpreting quantum behavior, as it defies classical logic. The concept has been explored since Niels Bohr's early work on atomic structure, and while various interpretations exist, the mystery remains central to our understanding of quantum systems.

Quantum mechanics doesn't provide an exact time for these jumps, adding complexity to their analysis. The "Copenhagen interpretation" describes quantum jumps as a probabilistic event influenced by the measurement, meaning an observed system "jumps" from one state to another. In contrast, interpretations like the "many-worlds" or "decoherence" approaches attempt to explain quantum jumps without the need for a sudden transition, instead suggesting the system evolves smoothly in an unseen multiverse or across superpositions.

Ahmed and Jose, as you both have contributed great insights, I'd love to hear your thoughts on how quantum jumps relate to the broader evolution of quantum mechanics. In my recent groundbreaking research on the limitations of the Schrödinger equation, titled "Schrödinger Equation Unfit for Fundamental Law" published in IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (September 2023), I argue that traditional quantum mechanics, as governed by Schrödinger's equation, might need revision. The equation fails to account for key quantum phenomena adequately, such as quantum jumps, implying we may need a new theoretical framework to fully understand these transitions. This research could reshape our understanding of quantum mechanics and pave the way for a revolutionary shift in the field.

Looking forward to more insightful contributions from both of you and the community. Let's push the boundaries of how we think about quantum mechanics!

Dear (@Sandeep Jaiswal), (@Jose Oreste Mazzini) and (@Javad Fardaei) your research is interesting.

I was impressed by your new ideas that describe a new classification of quantum mechanics, but I think the time has come to prove my belief through an applied case to confirm my theory. I reviewed the previous results of scientifically proven research on the hydrogen atom, and I extracted the results from my equations and compared the results with my equations. The results I obtained were almost identical in both cases. This is what makes me confident in my explanation of the quantum leap phenomenon. Whereas, the interpretation of the phenomenon of the quantum leap depends essentially on the contraction of space-time from the highest orbit until it reaches the size of the orbit of the electron in which it revolves. Through the contraction of the elastic fabric of space-time, forming ripples that correspond to the energy level as a result of space-time gaining energy, as Louis de Broglie said through his equation. 

n × λ = 2π × r

This makes us ask whether what the perspective from the electron's side? Electron he does not notice this interference because it is believed that the orbit it occupies is the same orbit after the fabric of space-time absorbs the energy. Because space-time distorted in the movement of the orbitals. This is a table of comparative results.

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal, Jose Oreste Mazzini and Javad Fardaei your research is interesting.

I wanted to know what you think of this new scientific proposal, do you agree with it? I would love to hear your scientific opinion.

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal As you mention, science is following standard modeling of Bohr theory, (modeling nature is not science)m

When you investigate about atom, you will find standard model still a theory.

CERN never been observed electron or proton/neutron to this date.

On the other hand, earlier century, QM stablished due to connecting mechanical modern physics to atomic size.

All the above is fact.

Our universe has unit, and that indivisible intelligent atom.

Article Intelligent Atom

So far no one ever contradict this paper, some CERN scientist read it as well. as far as I know.

In addition, one or two-dimension static equation cannot describe three-dimension of nature, sadly our scientists are following last century ideology with even think about it.

Please read it

I also wanted to add that this picture shows how the fabric of space-time is affected by electricity and magnetism, and this means that this law links space-time with electromagnetism in what is called (electromagnetic space-time). This makes the properties of electricity and magnetism flexible like the fabric of space-time, which demonstrates a relationship between the force of Gravity and electromagnetic force.

Explain how an electron affects the results of an experiment as it passes through a double-slit experiment while being in quantum contact with another electron.

If we delay the arrival time of one of the two quantum entangled electrons from the monitoring screen, what will happen is that normally the two electrons must coincide (the arrival of the two electrons) at the same time to the monitoring screen. But what happened is that we delayed one of the two electrons, so what will happen is that it will happen, a contraction in the fabric of space-time so that the distance between the two electrons is equal. Therefore, the lagging electron passes through the contracting fabric of space-time between it and the monitoring screen, so that the distance between the two electrons is equal when they are observed. But because of that contraction, the delayed electron exceeds the speed of light and is quantum entangled with the other electron. Therefore, it will be in the past, and this indicates that if the electron is detected, it will affect the results of the experiment.

The atomic number in the equation has been modified due to the total energy of the photon.