There are many ways in waste water treatment technologies. The most common is use of carbon black, but the emulsion can cause a problem. Second type of technologies used iron sulfate with hydrogen peroxide (Fenton reaction) for decolorisation and simultaneous floculation. Recently, there are developed new advanced oxidation technologies where colorised waters are anodically oxidated.
Colour usually is generated by double bonds (C=C). In those cases, ozone is a good option to break those bonds. If the BOD also is very high, it should be consider the combination of ozone and some biological treatment to reduce operative costs.
Why you want to remove the color from waste? Usually if it is a waste you cannot throw away as it is even if you decolorate it. And if you do not know how to remove the colour from the water it means that you are not qualified to manage the waste...
You could consider Advanced Fenton using zero-valent iron in place of ferrous with, if necessary, ultrasound/hydrocavitation or hydrocavitation produced by high-shear stirring. First though, try filtering through carbon granules. In the past those made from peat by Norit-Clydesdale have proved to be particularly effective.
Upon my experience, althought you can try activated carbon like a "reference adsorbent", you should know if your colours are positively or negatively charged.
What is really effective at a very low/no at all cost, it's to use dried agroindustrial wastes (such as spent coffee grounds, spent tea leaves, exausted lemon peels.....) as adsorbent or your pollutants.
If you can provide more information about your colourants, I can suggest you the best cheap adsorbent for your case.
I looked at using activated carbon or oxidation to treat wastewater from polymer manufacturing. It is difficult to remove a specific compound in a high TOC mixture using AC. I also had problems with ozone generating foam. I expect that you would have the same experience. UV/H2O2 oxidation worked the best and increased the biodegradability as well. The results were published in Water Environ. Res. 80(4), 373, 2008, you can get a copy from RG page if you are interested.
I think reverse osmosis would be a good choice however the membrane used would get damaged very easily by the chemicals present in the water and this could increase the running cost of the equipment. A good membrane could however give a long life time. The exact nature of chemicals present in the water will have to be known to find the right membrane material to use for reverse osmosis.
Without knowing anything about the source of the color, try in the lab a column packed with ground bagasse. Be sure to slurry pack the column because if dry packed, the bagasse will swell in water so much that there is almost no flow. You should be able to get bagasse for almost free because it is an agricultural waste product. Also try chitin, another waste product. If you want to try something a bit more expensive but that might have better dye adsoprtion capacity, try chitosan.
I would try filtering through activated carbon or peat granules first. It will most likely not remove all the colour but it will be a good starting point. From there you will need further treatment but this further treatment will be less intense and cheaper since you have essentially pre-treated the water with carbon.
You may consider using coal as a sorbent. A key aspect, as mentioned by others, is the charge of the dye. Coal can either be negatively charged or it can be negatively charged below pH 6-7 and positively charged above pH 7. This depends on the availability of carboxylic functional groups. Subbituminous coal tends to be negatively charged and a good adsorbent for positively charged ions (e.g. crystal violet). Our experience with Crystal Violet is that the ion diffuses into the coal and becomes irreversibly removed from solution. This is not necessarily the case with other sorbents. Coal can be combusted as a final step to incinerate the waste and generate energy. Finally coal is widely available and much cheaper than activated carbon.
The practical solution at commercial level in Asian countries is chemical coagulation combined with carbon/s and filtration. The final stage can be membrane technology, if required.
Some oxidation processes like ozonation can be an option followed by adsorption. http://www.yarbis.yildiz.edu.tr/web/userPubFiles/ukurt_ae155d878f4953b4e6ef1cf8ee9ad1be.pdf
I had some good results with electrocoagulation to destroyed some biological dyes (smirnoff A dye). I suggest you look more into this technique. Try a tabletop unit first and see what it can do for your effluent.
Many treatment alternatives available for the treatment of wastewater containing colour from polymer/emulsion. Chemical and physical methods such as coagulation, adsorption, reverse osmosis and ultra filtration were effective; however, these treatment methods requires post-treatment of solid wastes. Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) involving O3, O3/H2O2, O3/UV, UV/H2O2, O3/UV/H2O2 and Fe2+/H2O2 have been considered as an emerging technology. Unfortunately, AOP alone demanding higher chemicals that eventually induced higher costs of wastewater treatment operation. I suggest using the combination of AOP and biological treatment. In this combination, AOP increase the biodegradability of the colourant,, which eventually degrading in biological treatment.
There is a novel method we are developing at UAB that combines the efficiencies of AOPs and low cost of coagulation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you may be interested...
Any simple operation cannot treat your waste water completely. from the information given in question, i assume that your sample contains water soluble lower hydrocarbons and water insoluble higher hydrocarbons(fragments of polymer). so you can design a two step treatment plant, where in step-I you can remove higher hydrocarbons from water by passing through adsorption column (filled with sand/fly ash/sawdust/coal etc). The water obtained from step-I contains smaller hydrocarbons like formaldehyde, soluble starch etc ., which you can oxidize by simple addition KMnO4. After one or two days you can see clear water on the top and black oxidized product at the bottom. The sand/fly ash from adsorption column containing higher hydrocarbons can be used as fuel after proper drying.
I would add to the previous answer.... that it is possible to use an "homogeneus-like" catalytic ozonation.... by implementation of magnetic nanoparticles where the catalytic reaction take place.
For better understanding about this process and all the advantages, see our recent works or feel free to ask here.
Firstly, you should make analysis of the effluent to determine the major pollutants , also you should know the quantity of effluent per hr or per day after that you can choose the proper method depending on the coast, time and easy to treet
Adsorption of color by activated carbon is the most effective process to remove color from wastewater. There are several low-cost adsorbents that can be used for this purpose as kaolin, sewage sludge, and activated carbon from several agricultural solid waste.
Membrane ultra-filtration. If micron-sized particles are present then pre-treat with a membrane micro-filtration. As to the membrane material, I am not sure, maybe a ceramic membrane.
Color removal of dyes could be made using several methods including adsorption, advanced oxidation and coagulation. The choice of the method depends on the nature of the dyes and the presence of other pollutants
Try electrogoagulation which is an effective , cheap method of removing color from waste water . It has another advantages that it removes suspended matter , some impurities and does not add any chemical to the water. compares with chlorination for example .
i agree with Khorfan but it is not a cheap method. its economical part must be considered by local energy costs and technical feasibility. for example it is good method for treatment in Russia due to environmental parameter
For me your question can not be completely answered just by posting on this networking system . What you have asked can be a research title.But just to contribute what I have for the question. The first step is to charachterize the wastewater this helps you for example to know the pH and the presence of other similar substances in the wastewater . Knowing the property of the color is also very important . Then come choosing the method based on the facility you have . Currently there are many techenologies for color removal . For example adsorption using activated carbon or diffrent locally available materials is forwarded by many researchers. Five years before during my masters thesis for example , I found the by product of sulfuric acid and alum manufacturing indsutry , which is found in Ethiopia is effecient for removal of color . Similarly the others also proved this for diffrent types of colors. In general a research approach is required here .
As others mentioned, activated carbon is the most effective method, however sometimes it may be too expensive to be feasible in scales larger than lab scale. Another effective way is membrane filtration, however you need to know the MW of the coloring compound, and also membranes need to be protected from severe fouling.
De-Color is not exactly same as remove the dye. Depend on your requirement, you can choose the process: Absorption-Membrane filtration-Ozone or other combinanation.
Adsorption with different adsorbents can remove the color from wastewater. There are several adsorbents as activated carbon, clay, kaolin, bentonite, fly ash and others from agricultural wastes. All are of low cost of adsorption technique. You can load my book at the website http://www.intechopen.com/books/organic-pollutants-monitoring-risk-and-treatment .
I have worked with wastewater from textile industry using three stages treatment starting with SBR system followed by fenton reagent and finally coagulation. I found that coagulation was the most effective in removing the colour.
If energy is cheap in your region you can use electrochemistry (such as electro coagolation or electro fenton) if not you can use adsorption or coagolation
I agree with Mahdi. You can try also peroxicoagulation, a process combining Electro-Fenton and coagulation in a single step, which is described in some of our papers...
Colour or COD removal? Colour removal from dye-house is different from polymers emulsion manufacturers. We must ensure that the method(s) being proposed must really remove not only colour but other components also. Chances for colour causing dye molecules to get attached(Adsorbed -partially or fully) to these emulsions need to be observed and then methods are to be planned. Second aspect is Single method may not be helpful or economical. Hence try to consider electrochemical, microbial, etc etc methods.
Removal of dye from waste waters can be achieved by using adsorption methodology which is highly effective and economical and may involve low cost adsorbents derived mainly from locally available waste materials especially agricultural waste, such as, coir pith, pine tree bark, meranti wood, Moringa oleifera bark, M. oleifera leaves powder, Candida albicans biomass, tea factory waste, dehydrated wheat bran carbon, dehydrated peanut hull etc.
The color can be changed by changing PH of the solution. Decoloration is also possible with some bacterial species biochemistry & Microbial Depts. will help you..
Functional polymer adsorbents we have developed via radiation grafting process have been found to be very effective for removal of ionic dyes from industrial effluents...