The purpose of this project is to eliminate poverty from the whole world. However, it looks like sharing our research is the only solution to reduce poverty, which is, in my opinion, only provide us with personal benefits and not helping to cause of this project at all.
Please share your opinions about it. Thanks
Dear Muhammad
Poverty has reduced but not got eliminated over the last decades. The same period has seen increase in inequalities, rise in conflicts and climate chnage/disasters- which makes poverty reduction gains unsustainable.
I wonder if we should look at reducing inequalities and reducing poverty together. We need labour intensive growth, ceiling on number of houses people can have so real estate is affordable for poor, a norm on ratio of salaries of those at the top and bottom, norms on how much energy per capita can be consumed etc. Gender, race, caste, abilities based inequalities have to be address within that.
Best
Ranjani
Dear Ahmadi Murjani and Ranjani K. Murthy I totally agree with your viewpoint regarding the reduction of poverty. But my only concerned regarding the scope of this particular project.
The question is very relevant .
Directly not but indirectly it is a
knowledge bank for poor student eager to learn .
That's why I have included some
poverty related issues like , Economics , Health etc .
http://cinemalibrestudio.com/theendofpoverty/watch-now.html
This film from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation
https://schalkenbach.org/
is of great importance, with respect to your question.
Could you please look into the idea of www.kiva.org
Could you please look into the idea of www.kiva.org Maybe you are rich enough go give 25 US$ per microcredit - the money will be paid back and you can relend it. I had the luck of funding 80 microcredits since 2012 - a very rewarding and ongoing experience for myself...And that is an example of priciple... Helping others makes yourself happy... For only lending 25 US$ to another person or family in need (e.g. in Guatemala, Panama, Peru, the Philippines, in Kenya, Uganda or Kazakhstan)...
Perhaps I have some solutions to eradicate poverty and uprooting it, first the poor suffers from low income, education, low skills. The poor family suffers from a lack of home, and other problems were mentioned shortly. An ambitious local program can be worked out by the state, and the poor can be transformed into producers in more than one way: for example, introducing skill-raising courses with the necessary funds to enter courses and raise their abilities and skills.
Most of them can be developed in construction. They will be transformed into a high-level team in the construction of houses and buildings, and will use them to build houses and apartments for themselves. In this case, the houses will be built in record time. At the same time, schools are being built to educate the children of the poor and to raise their education and skills in the long term. In this way, we have uprooted poverty in the short and medium term. We have acquired high-level human capital because of education and training. We have added to GDP a new output and we have achieved higher growth than the past.
Dear Nazar Alqahwachi Carsten Weerth and Stephen I. Ternyik appreiates your responses and suggestions.
Poverty is a multidimensional problem, so it needs an interdisciplinary approach to deal with..
Every one has his own way to help , for example , the teacher in school helps by his teaching his students well , and the doctor helps by the good care for his patients , ... and so on ...
As we are researchers , so our help will be through our researches .
and if there is a benifit from this , it will be for all , and no problem at all to get this benifits .... like the doctor , he cures the patients and also he takes money ,... it is okay and no problem at all.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude