I believe you have M versus H plot from your VSM study. For paramagnetic sample you will get linear MH graph. For ferromagnetic sample MH graph will be non-linear more over there will a large area enclosed by MH graph for hard magnetic materials. Superparamagnetism is a form of magnetism, which appears in small ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles. The difference between the ferromagnetic behaviour and the superparamagnetic behavior is primarily determined by the size of the particle. As soon as it gets small enough, it exhibit superparamagnetism effect.
At equal concentration (volume fraction) magnetic phase (particles) in your material and the same amount of material, line graph for superparamagnetism will lie much higher than in the case of a paramagnetic material
At equal concentration (volume fraction) of magnetic phase (particles) and the same amount of material, line graph for superparamagnetism will lie much higher than in the case of a paramagnetic material.
At the request by Anupama Swain, I answer in more detail, with references.
In the General case, ferromagnetic bodies and the individual single-domain (but non-superparamagnetic) particles are characterized by nonlinear dependence of the magnetization with a smooth output to saturate in high magnetic fields. In the simple case of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy for particles with easy axis perpendicular to the direction of the external field, there is a threshold field strength H*, at which the magnetization vector lies along the field [1]. For an ensemble of such particles (with evenly distributed light directions of the axes in space) the hysteresis curve has a more complicated form [2]. For superparamagnetic particles (above the so-called blocking temperature TB which is the analogue of the Curie point TC, TB