How can cultural products, such as art, music, literature, and heritage sites, be leveraged to foster urban development and enhance the quality of life in cities? Additionally, how can cities ensure that the benefits of cultural products are accessible to all residents, and what role can public and private sectors play in supporting and sustaining cultural initiatives within urban environments?
See this paper(Handicrafts as cultural creative clusters: a spatial-cultural planning approach for the regeneration of the urban historical fabrics:DOI:Article Handicrafts as cultural creative clusters: a spatial-cultura...
)
I think the influence of other culture may distract the original culture when no hanorable mindset to them
An often ignored issue is the interaction between cultural facilities (such as studios) and the real estate market. Artists tend to look for cheap places to locate their studios or apartments given their meager income. Once those places become developed or boomed (or "hot" thanks to those artists' products), rent rises and will force the artists to look again for cheap places. Sunsheng Han and a co-author once published an article on this phenomenon in Chinese cities.
In the 1990s, the Queensland Government adopted a policy of requiring a certain percentage of the budget of certain defined construction projects to be set aside for street art. The policy diverted considerable sums towards public art. I can't remember the details - maybe you could inquire of the Department of the Arts. The lesson is that art can be fostered if it is funded. The limiting factor is simply budget. if governments think it's important and fund it adequately, it can happen. If artists et cetera are left to scrounge for funding from various philanthropic sources or bits and pieces here and there, then the results will be bits and pieces here and there.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology