I have concluded that it is because they are not constantly aroused by the physical presence of men.
What do you exactly mean by sexual frustration? Defining it will help understand your point and contribute effectively.
I would have thought the concept was clear if you are a man. Sexual frustration comes from (1) having an erection over an extended period (2) being aroused regularly by the presence of a potential attractive partner & (3) from a strong psychological urge to penetrate a person with an erect penis. None of these apply to women. Women talk of sexual desire, which is connected to their emotional responses and their sense of obligation to please a lover. No one can have a drive to be penetrated by a penis or other object.
First of all, the common biological drive for sex in both women and men are scientifically well established. However, your valuable papers highlight how woman is unique in the multiple drives for sexual relationship, ranging from biological, sensual, emotional, intellectual, social, moral, and even economic. You have assumed that woman might give sex to her partner who shows her signs of respect and evaluation. You also said that woman could give sex even if it is not accompanied with orgasm or ejaculation; 80% of all women. While man, on the other side, is almost visually aroused to have erection that should physically fulfilled and satisfied through orgasm and ejaculation immediately by the end of natural sexual intercourse. Taking in consideration the multiplicity of women’ sexual derives rather than men, it makes us expect the higher degree, and the longer time of sexual frustration in the side of women rather than men. In the light of the above-mentioned facts, does it not make sense to believe so?
The stronger sexual derive in woman makes her more intelligent, more patient, more passionate; suitable for overbearing unbearable responsibilities of a wife, a mother, and long-life teacher.
Not sure where your information is coming from? I am not suggesting anyone has a drive to be penetrated by a penis or other object. That doesn't make any sense. The motivation to penetrate arises in the mind of the penetrating male. The receiver is just someone who agrees to stay in position until the penetrating male has ejaculated - they are the receiver of male ejaculate. The pleasure is enjoyed by the penetrating male - which is why no one pays for sex as the receiver. Only males intent on penetration ever pay for sex.
As an academic and Literary Critic, it is too hard for me to take anything for granted without thinking. The source of what I mentioned is your first book on your Research Gate homepage "Ways Women Orgasm", as well as your papers titles which is so direct and indicative by the way. surly, I haven't the time to read all your papers, particularly when they are mot within the domain of my specialisation, yet the power of critical thinking urges me to record my objection here. If your assumption that no one has a drive to be penetrated by a penis or other object is true, how do you scientifically explain the phenomena of women' seduction of men in the normal cases, and nymphomaniac inclinations in abnormal cases?
So do you want to be penetrated by a penis or other object? If so, would you describe this desire as a drive in the same way that you want to penetrate a partner with your erect penis? There is such a thing as common sense. You need a certain level of sexual experience and objectivity to understand sexual response.
Islam, as well as Christianity and Judaism, regulates "penetration" within the framework of legal marital relationship between a man and a woman. "Penetration" as a stage in the intimate sexual relationship is essentially meant to man earth, beside satisfying human biological, emotional, social, and psychological needs. Any relationship outside this typical natural one is a deviation from natural laws, and is an expression of mental or psychological disorder. A good Muslim shall not have extramarital sexual relationship with any woman rather than his own wife. No man-man or Woman-woman, or even extra marital man-woman sexual relationships is allowed within any religious community. Only through this divine law the society shall be moral, pure, and socially stable. Whether you like it or not, that is the truth.
Intercourse is very important to men's emotional well-being. But women can go for months and years without sexual activity of any kind unless they have a relationship with a man. Restricting male sexual activity to a marriage partner goes against nature and ensures that a wife needs to supply all her husband's sexual needs. She does this with a sense of obligation where he pays the bills. But as women get more financial independence they wait until their family is grown before deciding that enough is enough - they have done their duty.