27 January 2025 3 6K Report

Dear all,

I am currently conducting a meta-analysis using the CMA software and have encountered some SEM studies. I have selected the "Correlation and sample size" option in CMA, and I am entering the path coefficients into the correlation field, while using the study's sample size as the number of participants.

I would greatly appreciate any advice or clarification on whether this approach is correct. Should path coefficients be treated as correlations in this context, or is there a better way to handle SEM data in meta-analysis? Additionally, I was wondering if anyone could point me to any articles that provide detailed guidance on how to enter different types of effect sizes in CMA?

Thank you so much for your time and help!

More Qikai Wang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions