Since Generalized AI has no human brain, they must be aware of all pertinent "external" behavior patterns and behavior pattern markers AND effective environmental aspects: Ethogram Theory with its body of 500+ pages of recent supporting essays (following some early, courser, yet must-read, foundational papers) provides just this, focusing only on clear behavior patterns and environmental aspects AND AS THEY UNFOLD WITH ONTOGENY -- ALL with "external" (directly observable overt) aspects AND environmental contingencies (including sophisticated Memories, for context; YET: ALL aspects, in good part, at-least-one-time-seen or clearly indicated OVERTLY).
This is why AI people should look at my Ethogram Theory , etc. AND the related General AI Project: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Developing-a-Usable-Empirically-Based-Outline-of-Human-Behavior-for-FULL-Artificial-Intelligence-and-for-Psychology
But also see the Ethogram Theory Project and all its References and Updates (in the Project Log): https://www.researchgate.net/project/Human-Ethology-and-Development-Ethogram-Theory
For General AI to use Psychology, this is the only choice. It is also a clear and parsimonious choice and fully empirically based/founded/grounded (and complete for having/providing for the full basic foundation/base "containing" cognitive-developmental hierarchical system).
ALSO: This is also completely good for Psychology as well, for a good perspective, approach, and good hypotheses -- BETTER THAN THIS FIELD HAS NOW. I now turn to AI because Psychology is not sufficiently empirically based or "driven" to be this way. (I turn to others who must understand and 'see" behavior patterns correctly and have good empirical testable hypotheses, such as I provide ; perhaps, again, Psychology will find itself FOLLOWING information-processing.)
What would you mean by an AI brain and what would differ it from a human one?
There are 4 patterns for an AI agent: to think like human, to act like human, to think ranionally and to act rationally.
We have seen asimo or sofia humanoids that can communicate and interact with humans and answer and make questions rationally. I believe that if we have come to a point where the self-referenced systems would be able to recreate other systems, agents would be close to human attributes.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology