The duration of a typical peer-review process varies significantly depending on the journal, the field of research, and the complexity of the paper. While some journals may have a rapid peer-review process that takes only a few days, others may take several months or even longer. In general, most journals strive to provide a high-quality review process that ensures the accuracy and reliability of the published research.
With that being said, a peer-review process that takes only 48 hours seems unusually short, and there is a possibility that such a process may not be very effective in ensuring the quality of the paper. The short time frame could indicate that the reviewers did not thoroughly read and evaluate the paper, which could ultimately lead to a flawed or unreliable publication. However, it is important to note that each journal has its own set of criteria for peer-review and what may seem like an unusual short time frame could be normal for some journals.
I think the answer is yes this is technically possible but like mentioned before, I would be very skeptical and wonder immediately if it is a low-quality journal.