- Ali F, Chowdary B V., Maharaj J (2014) Influence of Some Process Parameters on Build Time , Material Consumption , and Surface Roughness of FDM Processed Parts : Inferences Based on the Taguchi Design of Experiments. Proc. 2014 IACJ/ISAM Jt. Int. Conf.
- Gajdoš I, Slota J (2013) Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes. Tech Gaz 20:231–236. doi: 658.512.2:004.896
- Galantucci LM, Bodi I, Kacani J, Lavecchia F (2015) Analysis of Dimensional Performance for a 3D Open-source Printer Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique. Procedia CIRP 28:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.014
- Lužanin O, Movrin D, Plančak M (2014) Effect of Layer Thickness, Deposition Angle, and Infill on Maximum Flexural Force in Fdm-Built Specimens. J Technol Plast 39:49–58.
- Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Grey Taguchi Method for Improving Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Process. AIMS Int Conf Value-based Manag 608–613.
- Sreedhar P, Manikandan CM, Jothi G (2012) Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness for Fused Deposition Modeled Part with Different Angular Orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 5:21–27.
- Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Lam JSL, et al (2014) Process characterisation of 3D-printed FDM components using improved evolutionary computational approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 781–793. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6679-5
- Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P (2001) Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 118:385–388. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3
- Wu W, Geng P, Li G, et al (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials (Basel) 8:5834–5846. doi: 10.3390/ma8095271
- Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81:174–196. doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
- Moza Z, Kitsakis K, Kechagias J, Mastorakis N Optimizing Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Filament Fabrication using Taguchi Design. 110–114.
- Nancharaiah T, Raju DR, Raju VR (2010) An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 1:106–111
- Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, Sood AK (2013) A Study on Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processed Parts using Fuzzy Logic. J Manuf Sci Prod 13:183–197. doi: 10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010
- Saqib S, Urbanic J (2011) An Experimental Study to Determine Geometric and Dimensional Accuracy Impact Factors for Fused Deposition Modelled Parts. 4th Int Conf Chang Agil Reconfigurable Virtual Prod. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
- Maçanares CG, de S. Zancul E, Cavalcante da Silva J, Cauchick Miguel P a. (2015) Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7092-4
- Ali F, Chowdary B V., Maharaj J (2014) Influence of Some Process Parameters on Build Time , Material Consumption , and Surface Roughness of FDM Processed Parts : Inferences Based on the Taguchi Design of Experiments. Proc. 2014 IACJ/ISAM Jt. Int. Conf.
- Gajdoš I, Slota J (2013) Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes. Tech Gaz 20:231–236. doi: 658.512.2:004.896
- Galantucci LM, Bodi I, Kacani J, Lavecchia F (2015) Analysis of Dimensional Performance for a 3D Open-source Printer Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique. Procedia CIRP 28:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.014
- Lužanin O, Movrin D, Plančak M (2014) Effect of Layer Thickness, Deposition Angle, and Infill on Maximum Flexural Force in Fdm-Built Specimens. J Technol Plast 39:49–58.
- Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Grey Taguchi Method for Improving Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Process. AIMS Int Conf Value-based Manag 608–613.
- Sreedhar P, Manikandan CM, Jothi G (2012) Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness for Fused Deposition Modeled Part with Different Angular Orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 5:21–27.
- Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Lam JSL, et al (2014) Process characterisation of 3D-printed FDM components using improved evolutionary computational approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 781–793. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6679-5
- Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P (2001) Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 118:385–388. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3
- Wu W, Geng P, Li G, et al (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials (Basel) 8:5834–5846. doi: 10.3390/ma8095271
- Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81:174–196. doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
- Moza Z, Kitsakis K, Kechagias J, Mastorakis N Optimizing Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Filament Fabrication using Taguchi Design. 110–114.
- Nancharaiah T, Raju DR, Raju VR (2010) An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 1:106–111
- Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, Sood AK (2013) A Study on Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processed Parts using Fuzzy Logic. J Manuf Sci Prod 13:183–197. doi: 10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010
- Saqib S, Urbanic J (2011) An Experimental Study to Determine Geometric and Dimensional Accuracy Impact Factors for Fused Deposition Modelled Parts. 4th Int Conf Chang Agil Reconfigurable Virtual Prod. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
- Maçanares CG, de S. Zancul E, Cavalcante da Silva J, Cauchick Miguel P a. (2015) Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7092-4
You can also read my paper entitled 'Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects'. It contains all the relevant published papers.
Any test part which would be best suited for testing part quality in FDM 3d printing. Quality parameters can be dimensional accuracy, surface roughness, overhang and scaffolds. The material being used for printing is PLA and the printer is Leapfrog XEED. Interface used is simplify 3D.
I would be varying the quality relevant parameters for this work piece to find out the effects and finding out the best working parameters.