It is a common consideration of people to think that s/he is correct. But there may be some other ideas/ thoughts of other people. Conflicts arise then.
Some persons think that s/ he is defeated if anybody oppose his/ her idea.
It is commonly found in different conferences.
What is your advice to tackle such situations?
I think in science/research,anyone can have a great idea irrespective of his/her position in the concerned department.
However,if we are open to positive criticism,it will for sure bring improvement.Mostly we are accepting the suggestions/advices by persons senior to us in our fields but reverse trends rarely exist where we feel shy to accept that a lab assistant or research associate may have wonderful idea on a typical aspect.
One should not imagine that what he knows is the best.
At least I do not feel shy of asking to my seniors/juniors (including teachers or even any supporting field staff) .
Before starting any experiment ,we should share the idea,have opinions across the supporting and faculty personnel's and implement the best options keeping in view the pros and cons of all such persons.
it will definitely give chance of better options than your sole mind.
Anyone, who thinks she/he is always right, is either has personality disorder or narcissist, or both. It is her/his fear of being exposed to others, they can't even be honest with themselves. They see only what they want to see.
They even do not think about the possibility of "our opinion may not be correct sometimes".
No body is ever always correct. We must learn to sometimes consider the points of view of others!
I think in science/research,anyone can have a great idea irrespective of his/her position in the concerned department.
However,if we are open to positive criticism,it will for sure bring improvement.Mostly we are accepting the suggestions/advices by persons senior to us in our fields but reverse trends rarely exist where we feel shy to accept that a lab assistant or research associate may have wonderful idea on a typical aspect.
One should not imagine that what he knows is the best.
At least I do not feel shy of asking to my seniors/juniors (including teachers or even any supporting field staff) .
Before starting any experiment ,we should share the idea,have opinions across the supporting and faculty personnel's and implement the best options keeping in view the pros and cons of all such persons.
it will definitely give chance of better options than your sole mind.
Always go for evidence....one might be very intelligent and correct which others might not appreciate but his intelligence will be supported by evidences which are not controlled by himself. To remove observer bias, randomisation is advised so as to eliminate the chance effect. Same applies here. If one thinks that his peers are not competent to judge his idea but wishes to stay on it, he should move to more appropriate peers, like what this Researchgate does to us. All are about to get support, to get criticism and to progress in avenue of science. But that doesn't mean that one should stand at a fixed imaginary place and claim false things.
Either in our conversation either in official matter or in our friendly talk or our family matter we have very often to talk & express our views in the concern matter where we fill that our point of view in this matter is true or correct . It is likely that the concern person may not agree with our views & he may accept the same in another way . With this in this manner a right or wrong argument may take place & if it is a family problem amicable solution always results .
In case of such differences between true & wrong with involvement with other the result of the same may have to be accepted according to the nature of our position .
This is my personal opinion
Very crucial thing sometimes in different forum, different people poses diverse personalities and of course narcissist too! I am try to say from my point of view if not understand or time not allowed surrender to the insane to save energy and resources too! But never find conclusion.
That we respond with consistency supported by a logical argument.
Regards!
Abraham Lincoln once said that "Folks without any vices have very few virtues" Thus, I suggest a person should always be mindful that no matter how great he/she is, they can sometimes learn from others.
Yep I follow Prof Bandyopadhyay's words 100 % . I have my understanding and nobody can alter it so best 'X' (do not care in digital electronics )
Depends on the situation too...
Each Lamour Ward .. In the end everything may not seem right is right .. This time makes it true because the world is full of surprises
The problem of human conflict is the problem of standards and perspectives before the problem of right and wrong, and what people think is a conflict between right and wrong, is in fact a conflict between right and other right; every contestant often believes that he is right and his opponent is invalid, The angle from which any disputed is seen has found nothing of the truth with him a little or a lot.
No one is a know all. Learning is an unending activity. Its no grudge if your ideas are abrogated. Its not a defeat but a win. Humility takes us far and makes us recognise the good in others. It helps us grow and develop. Is no wrong to learn from others.
Hi dear,
This question is related to negotiation techniques. To win any negotiation is to avoid it.
Best regards!
Adel
I have met some who are legends in their own minds and they never earn the respect they ultimately seek!
If you want see how analytic philosophy addresses the issue of "faultless disagreements" which your question refers to, you may wish to refer to Kolbel M. (2004) “Faultless Disagreement” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104: 53-73 October.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction