I am sure they have understood that I am trying to deflect and return the developing seismic forces into the ground from where they came from before they developed on the construction site.
I stop the torque - moment of inertia and the bending of the wall, just as you stop in the air, the cantilever of a prestressed valley bridge.
You send the torques to the pedestal and I send them to the ground.
I am still trying to create anchoring conditions with a deep anchoring mechanism that expands with a hydraulic jack and fill the hole after anchoring with concrete.
If the anchorage is not enough I go deeper into the ground.
Although this is not enough, then create a bundle of anchorages with a headband.
This is what the tree with the roots does in nature.
The forces of action and reaction are real but not visible.
The overturning momentum of the wall is real and is nothing more than a force that tends to rotate the wall around the hinge of its base, just as the car wheel rotates around the axle.
To achieve balance and stop the rotation of the wheel we use the brakes, that is, a force equal to and opposite to this force that causes the rotation of the wheel.
That's what I do too.
At the moment of inertia of the wall (the moment of inversion) I create a moment of stability coming from the ground.
You do the same.
In the moment of inertia - overturning of the wall, a moment of stability is opposed derived from the cross-sections of the load-bearing elements around the nodes (capable cross-sectional design)
Our difference is that the power of the invention comes from the ground, which is an external source, while the other from the reaction nodes.
The external torque transmitted to the carrier by the mechanism of the invention has the advantage that it has no mass and has unlimited strengths, while this cross-sectional reaction has its limits and multiplies the tipping moment since it has mass which creates the inertia force from where the tipping moment comes from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhkUlxC6IK4
It really is a great idea and I can say that your theory will be successful
Dear Houssam Khelalfa
there are experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoM5pEy7n9Q
Publications
Article The Ultimate Anti-Seismic System
simulations Experiment Findings Simulation and numerical investigation of seismic system behavior
There is no money ... for certification of anchors
If it is subject & specialization he may give justice to his subject .As he know that knowledge is power & in certain case it offer justice to the subject .In other case it becomes difficult to draw a line of demarcation .
This is my personal opinion
Dear Rohit Manilal Parikh
It is difficult to explain in words, simulations and mathematics, what shows you so simply an experiment, which has great acceleration and duration!
2.41g of natural earthquake, on a specimen under scale.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoM5pEy7n9Q&t=10s
No other seismic design could stand on this seismic base.
What else?
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-things-that-Engineers-know-that-most-people-dont
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Engineers_Know_and_How_They_Know_It
Dear Faraed Salman
I will tell you in the next article what they do not know but also what they know but do not do.
I am the father of the method
- Badges
- Science topic