Dear Researchgate Community,
I am currently trying to couple taurine to a protein via EDC reaction. I have already tried the following attempts:
1) Direct coupling at either pH 5 - 6, by only using EDC
2) Direct coupling in a two-step reaction with the aid of NHS
3) Succinylation of the lysine residues of the protein, then coupling by EDC only at pH 6
For all attempts, I have used around 7-fold molar excess of EDC to expected -COOH groups of the protein, and around 9-fold molar excess of taurine, if not even up to 20-fold.
The way I analyze "coupling efficiency" is by measuring the zeta potential of the dialyzed product at different pH, in hopes that since taurine "masks" lysine residues and offers a sulfonic acid instead, the IEP must drift to more acidic pH values. After succinylation alone, such a drift could be observed, but after EDC reaction, I keep finding an IEP that is been even more basic than my native protein, which could be caused by side-reactions due to EDC. After EDC/NHS reaction, the IEP is unchanged compared to the native protein.
I have found a paper (doi: 10.1007/bf01046841) in which taurine was succesfully coupled to succinylated ovalbumin and couldn't find anything that I did differently in terms of pH and amounts of reagents. My only "weak points" would be the total volume I'm working with. Judging by this, I have always used more concentrated solutions of protein, taurine and EDC (by using less water). I wouldn't expect this to impact the reaction, but I might be very mistaken. Does anyone have experience or knowledge about this?
I would be very much thankful for any help. Could it really be the reaction volumes? Am I using too much EDC, facilitating the reaction to N-acyl-urea derivates (although I have found similar amounts of EDC in literature, and have used the same amount to successfully couple ethylenediamine to the same protein before)? Am I overlooking something vital?
Thank you in advance.