It has seemed to me in my consulting practice that when staff nurses participate in reviewing their actual daily routines against best practices that they can then see that a shared mental model of actual "scheduled" processes in the day makes sense. They learn they must offer initial direction and ongoing checkpoints to NAPs (as would be suggested by state nurse practice acts) and also review team progress/success and offer feedback prior to the end of the shift (best teamwork routines).Interaction at eye level at the patient's bedside about patient/family goals becomes a norm.  The new shared mental model ("A Day in the Life of an Expert") becomes part of a group teamwork identity.  

At the present I note that some of the basic professional leadership practices are missing at the bedside:  leadership in helping patients identify and engage in shared goals, lack of delegation and supervision of assistive personnel). Wouldn't the predominant method staff RNs use for processing (Conservator) support creating a clearly defined structure of best practices? Using a structure that incorporates expert practices  and "routine" steps could potentially ensure better care and would fit thinking patterns.  

Perhaps I am taking this study several steps too far?

Thank you! 

Article Nurses information-processing patterns: Impact on change and...

Similar questions and discussions