Faris good day. This has nothing to do directly with the question, but thank you for commenting.
With respect to your comment and your paper I see the move to the green economy as a win-win way the mainstream thinkers such as those in the UNCSD decided to follow to partially implement the fixing request of the 1987 bruntland commission request to make markets socially and environmentally friendly and inclusive as they were not working.....and this move is consistent with the step by step path towards sustainability markets they are perhaps uncontiously following....
I do do not see it as an hegemonic move at all as you seem to do as the economy(economists) and environment(environmentalists) are in parthership, not in conflict...the same as the shift from red socialist to socially friendly capitalism in china and former soviet states is another win-win move, not hegenomic at all,,,the economy is not in conflict with society.....When you shift paradigms, you leave the knowledge based behind and create a paradigm shift knowledge gap, the same is true for the shift from red socialism to socially friendly capitalism(!1991) and for the shift from the pure economy to the green economy(2012)....
You should read these papers you will see a different view on the same issue from the sustainability point of view:,,,,thanks for commenting
Understanding the Death and Paradigm Shift of Adam Smith’s model: Was Going Green the Only Option? If not, Is This Option the Most Sustainable One?
Adam Smith and Karl Marx Under the Sustainability Eye: Pointing Out and Comparing the Sustainability Gaps Behind these Two Great Simplification Failures.
The Past Versus the Present in Development Thinking: Pointing Out the Structure of the Old Agricultural Development Model After Internalizing Environmental Externalities.
Dear Faris, I am sharing here my most recent publications as food for thoughts:
Adam Smith and Karl Marx Under the Sustainability Eye: Pointing Out and Comparing the Sustainability Gaps Behind these Two Great Simplification Failures
Paradigm Evolution and Sustainability Thinking: Using a Sustainability Inversegram to State Paradigm Death and Shift Expectations under Win-Win and No Win-Win Situations
Dear friends, here sharing my most recent article which I trust you may find interesting in terms of food for thoughts:
If Going From Free Markets to Non-Free Markets is the Way to Go: Does This Means the End of Rational Decision Making Thinking or Is This Just a Temporary Block of a Perfect Paradigm Shift to Green Markets?
The shift to the green economy does not necessarily mean the end of singular welfare functions. In fact, many green policies are designed to promote social welfare and reduce inequality. For example, policies that promote renewable energy can create jobs and reduce energy costs for low-income households. Similarly, policies that promote sustainable agriculture can help small farmers and improve food security
Chuck, good day. Before replying, i suggest you read the papers by me I shared above and see what is the nature of the choice structure under which green markets operate, which support green economies and green growth. Plus, keep in mind, there are not green markets set up yet despite the world agreed in Rio +20 /2012 they would do so, so there are no green economies yet now 2023.
If you comment again, then I will take it that you are making an informed comment and then I will respond to your specific comment.