The liberal economic policy of India has achieved some growth and helped in reducing poverty. However, they have been less successful in generating good quality jobs. There was progress in providing better access to education, health services ,and clean drinking water and sanitation, but less than was hoped. The area where performance has been most disappointing is environmental sustainability.
Could you provide some more context? Does the policy simply ignore environmental sustainability or does it deliberately include strategies and plans that are harmful for the environment?
Maryam Jafroudi Thank you for the reply. I am completely agree with you.
Dear Minaketan Beg
This inference is to be judiciously commented. India being in a Developing phase, has many projects for National, Financial and Infrastructural growth.
While the growth is forthcoming for capital growth, the employemnt for job less is yet to become progressive.
In the same context, if environmental diligence is to be adjudged, a lot is desired to be done.
Certain projects follow a ZTC ie zero tree cut policy at their site ie DMRC at NCR felled the least trees and when required shifted trees to alternate position , but in many projects trees have been lost ie 6000 Nos at Aarey Forest for Mumbai metro, 68000 trees at Gomti bamks for Defence Expo project. And some othrs too.
Social diligence and quality of living in communities, a dam was made in Orissa and this cut off a few villages and no connectivity, and sustenance. Until one bridge was made , bringing life in the villages.
This has to be taken care off.
Well wishes.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India