There is major problem in Science: someone trusts, someone doesn't think about, what the World exists. But Science so high respects illusion teaching of India people, what dears not to prove existence of the Existence.
I am not so tolerant. If the World does not exist, then this sentence is true. Thus, it is real. Therefore, I came to contradiction. Then the World does exist. Proof ends.
Now, the Science can start to gain knowledge, not the illusions.
Objection: the Existence exists partly: some information about things is true and exists, but the things do not. Information about illusion is not true: "the apple is red, but there is no apple", thus the true information about thing means, that the thing is not illusion. Defense is done.