There is major problem in Science: someone trusts, someone doesn't think about, what the World exists. But Science so high respects illusion teaching of India people, what dears not to prove existence of the Existence.

I am not so tolerant. If the World does not exist, then this sentence is true. Thus, it is real. Therefore, I came to contradiction. Then the World does exist. Proof ends.

Now, the Science can start to gain knowledge, not the illusions.

Objection: the Existence exists partly: some information about things is true and exists, but the things do not. Information about illusion is not true: "the apple is red, but there is no apple", thus the true information about thing means, that the thing is not illusion. Defense is done.

More Dmitri Martila's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions