Recent studies (below) showed that predators may need to optimize their diets concerning not only energy but also quality of matter eaten. However, according to common assumption, this is not intuitive (see papers below). What are your thoughts? Is it possible that predators are limited because of macro- or micro- nutrients concentrations in matter eaten? What about elements? Is it possible that for predators important are ratios other than traditional C:N:P, studied using the framework of ecological stoichiometry? What about K and Na? What about Zn:Fe ratio (these two elements compete for absorption sites)?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.12523/abstract

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.201400171/abstract

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.12523/abstract

Article Do wild carnivores forage for prey or for nutrients?

More Michał Filipiak's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions