In Greek philosophy, since matter, space, and, time were considered as absolute so power as Prime Mover had been assigned to Allah/God. Newton gave the power of motion of celestial and terrestrial bodies to the matter per see inherent power of gravity, thus Newton deprived God of the power of Prime Mover also and reduced God to a powerless entity somewhere though he was a believer and would go to Church also which suggests that he was not a philosopher. Either Newton should have left going to Church after giving his laws/theory or he should not have given the laws/theory because his theory was philosophically incorrect. Philosophical difficulties of Newton's theory is a long discourse and would be posted separately.

Einstein was a trickster right from the start and he would also talk about God whereas he laid the foundation of physics under which there is absolutely no chance of existence of Allah/God. This is how they were not philosophers and their contribution to physics is negative. Maxwell has done excellent work as he could do just that because at that time, time was absolute but yet he gave a clue that gravitation may be an electromagnetic force, suggesting that he was the real philosopher. The proof that Einstein was a trickster is partly described in the Rebuttal to Lann N. Ramez, the man who had accepted my open challenge to the theory of relativity, and the other half of the proof is in the paper titled 'Experimental & Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of the Space-time concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' which is available in my profile in ResearchGate, SlideShare and Academia.edu and viXra. I consider Descartes to be one of the great philosophers who proposed the existence of aether besides the concept of innate knowledge of the existence of Allah/God in all humans. I looked for proof of aether for several years by reading physics & philosophy. Finally, I confirmed the existence of aether through the very experiment due to which aether was rejected. Since aether fills the space, space has to be absolute as such space cannot be connected with anything as they did it by making the space-time concept and dragging the concept to the Big Bang but if we accept the Big Bang Theory then a simple question arises as to where was aether before the Big Bang which question still stands at present as to where from the imaginary Dark Matter & Dark Energy has come? Once aether is confirmed light/radiation is an electromagnetic wave motion due to the vibrations of electric dipoles of aether. With the aether the theory of relativity is baseless and so E=mc^2 has been shown as fundamentally incorrect, the space-time concept is absolute rubbish and all forces of nature are electromagnetic forces, Newton's incorrect laws are not universal as every star system has its time frame and different gravitational property depending upon the recessional motion of star system and all problems of physics are resolve. With aether, the scientific view of the non-existence of Allah/God changes to the obvious and evident existence of Allah/God, the Creator and Sustainer of the universe. All this is shown in my published papers which are available on Academia.edu, ResearchGate, SlideShare, General Science Journal, Natural Philosophers Database, and vixra where everybody can see the open challenge to the theory of relativity that I have put forward and the same is standing since last twelve years despite a few physicists accepted the challenge but finally, they failed miserably. An alternative theory of the creation of the universe by obvious and evident Allah/God stands proposed whereunder mockery of physics in the form of space-time concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, the Big Bang Theory including the jugglery of inflation has been shown as baseless

More Mohammad Shafiq Khan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions