I think that the choice seems very difficult to the scientific community of what could be the good value of the Hubble constant following the existence of two apparently competing values which are 73 km s−1 Mpc−1 and 67 .3 km s−1 Mpc−1. Thanks that these latter values are known precise could we think that it could be absolutely very possible to imagine a new cosmological model allowing the co-existence of these two values on the condition that this so-called new cosmological model stipulates that the two values are concerning two absolutely different areas of space, an area concerned by the value of approximately 67.3 km s−1 Mpc−1 and another area concerned by the value of approximately 73 km s−1 Mpc−1!
- Did anyone come to his mind that this thing can happen in a new cosmological model that is larger and more enriched by possible new cosmological parameters?
- What do people think of a possible cosmological model allowing the coexistence in space of two zones with different expansions?
- Why the universe could need two different expansion rates and two different expansion zones?
-IS DARK ENERGY RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH A DIVISION OF SPACE BETWEEN TWO EXPANSIONS ZONES?
It is necessary to invent a new cosmological parameter to solve the problem of the two values of the Hubble constant. One of the two values proposed by the scientific community would, in my opinion, be a new cosmological parameter. This is what I just did in my pre-publication on RG where I explained that the value 67.3 has nothing to do with a good value for the Hubble constant. According to my preprint I created a formula which relates the value of 67.3 to the value of HA which is known to have an approximate value of 55. My preprint allows us to realize that the value 67.3 (or 67.4) should no longer appears as a possible value for the Hubble constant. And the approximate value of the Hubble constant should be between 72- 73.
The suggestion of these 2 values is that the model of each is based on faulty assumptions. For example, the redshift of spectral light from galaxies may NOT be due to the Doppler effect. Or, the CMB is not really "cosmic". Or both.
Cosmology - 1 equation, 1 force
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFcXZlAUlIE
Dear all,
After I have opened this discussion I have posted two preprints on RG they are my response on this subject:
- DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.19702.82241A "New model for Cosmology which involves the role of the Dark-Energy Parameter ΩA to resolve the problem of the two values proposed for the Hubble Constant"
- DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.16896.24325 "Identification of two Cosmological Parameters from the Planck base-ΛCDM whose ratio leads to a very accurate value for the Hubble Constant in agreement with the value of Freedman et al."
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing