The rebuttal reveals the deliberate wrongs done by Einstein to derive the Lorentz transformation in his 1905 main paper. The wrongs done have been exposed in detail in the rebuttal which no physicist has done for last more than one century. Alternative transformation has been derived which explains all the paradoxes whereas space has to be treated as absolute in view of existence of aether confirmed experimentally in the paper titled 'Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' which has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Those interested in the discussion should read the open challenge and the other papers mentioned in the rebuttal as all the papers are available on ResearchGate in my profile. With absolute space Big Bang Theory alongwith space-time concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy are just to be wound up.
@ Preston Guynn
You are mixing up the issue of detection of transverse Doppler effect of matter particles and that of the radiation/light. I have conceded in my paper that transverse Doppler effect of matter has been detected but we are concerned with transverse Doppler effect of radiation/light including the microwaves. If you believe that there is evidence of length contraction in the direction of motion then go ahead and convince the world and prove that there is no transverse Doppler effect as it is compensated by what you call Thomas Precision then how come the transverse Doppler effect of matter has been detected. Let you know that there is no experimental evidence of length contraction in the direction of motion till date as it is irrational to think of such a possibility in view of existence of aether in space which stands experimentally confirmed. Where would aether go from the contracted space. If the Doppler effect is compensated by what you call Thomas Precision in case of light/radiation including microwaves then how come Doppler effect has been detected as early as nineteenth century. Thomas Precision concerns the matter particles not light/radiation and
you are simple trying to confuse the participants. See the applicability of Thomas Precision google search below and don't try to mislead participants.
Thomas precession is a relativistic correction that describes the rotation of a gyroscope or the spin of an elementary particle. It's a kinematical effect that occurs due to the successive boosts that happen when an electron accelerates.
Thomas precession
Explanation
A relativistic correction that accounts for the rotation of the electron's rest frame
Importance
Important in atomic physics, especially for spin-orbit interaction
Discovery
Discovered in 1926 by L. T. Thomas
Analysis
Similar to Foucault's pendulum
Thomas precession is a result of two successive Lorentz transformations in different directions. These transformations are equivalent to a Lorentz transformation plus a three-dimensional rotation. This rotation of the local frame of rest causes the Thomas precession.
When Thomas precession is taken into account, it explains the fine structure and anomalous Zeeman effect in atoms. It also provides a deeper understanding of the spin-orbit interaction in nuclear physics.
@ Preston Guynn
You are mixing up the issue of detection of transverse Doppler effect of matter particles and that of the radiation/light. I have conceded in my paper that transverse Doppler effect of matter has been detected but we are concerned with transverse Doppler effect of radiation/light including the microwaves. If you believe that there is evidence of length contraction in the direction of motion then go ahead and convince the world and prove that there is no transverse Doppler effect as it is compensated by what you call Thomas Precision then how come the transverse Doppler effect of matter has been detected. Let you know that there is no experimental evidence of length contraction in the direction of motion till date as it is irrational to think of such a possibility in view of existence of aether in space which stands experimentally confirmed. Where would aether go from the contracted space. If the Doppler effect is compensated by what you call Thomas Precision in case of light/radiation including microwaves then how come Doppler effect has been detected as early as nineteenth century. Thomas Precision concerns the matter particles not light/radiation and
you are simple trying to confuse the participants. See the applicability of Thomas Precision google search below and don't try to mislead participants.
Thomas precession is a relativistic correction that describes the rotation of a gyroscope or the spin of an elementary particle. It's a kinematical effect that occurs due to the successive boosts that happen when an electron accelerates.
Thomas precession
Explanation
A relativistic correction that accounts for the rotation of the electron's rest frame
Importance
Important in atomic physics, especially for spin-orbit interaction
Discovery
Discovered in 1926 by L. T. Thomas
Analysis
Similar to Foucault's pendulum
Thomas precession is a result of two successive Lorentz transformations in different directions. These transformations are equivalent to a Lorentz transformation plus a three-dimensional rotation. This rotation of the local frame of rest causes the Thomas precession.
When Thomas precession is taken into account, it explains the fine structure and anomalous Zeeman effect in atoms. It also provides a deeper understanding of the spin-orbit interaction in nuclear physics.
I think those who read the following information will be in a better position to reply this question.
Unless and until a physicist is a philosopher, he cannot contribute anything to physics. Newton was not a philosopher. He deprived God of the only power as Prime Mover which Greek philosophy had assigned to Him. Because Newton gave the power of motion of celestial and terrestrial bodies to matter as the inherent power of gravity, thus Newton reduced God to a powerless entity somewhere and he was a believer and would go to Church also. Either Newton should have left going to Church after giving his laws/theory or he should not have given the laws/theory because his theory was philosophically incorrect. This; we can discuss when we both have time. Whereas Einstein was a trickster right from the start and he would also talk about God whereas he laid the foundation of physics under which there is absolutely no chance of the existence of God. This is how they were not philosophers and their contribution to physics is negative. Maxwell has done excellent work as he could do just that as was possible at that time because at that time time was absolute but yet he gave a clue that gravitation may be an electromagnetic force. As proof that Einstein was a trickster, half of the tricks are described in the Rebuttal to Lann N. Ramez, the man who had accepted my open challenge to theory of relativity, and other half of the proof is in the paper titled 'Experimental & Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of the Space-time concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' which is available in my profile. I consider Descartes one of the great philosophers and he had proposed the existence of aether and I looked for the proof of aether and finally I confirmed the existence of aether through the very experiment due to which aether was rejected. Since the aether fills the space, space has to be absolute as such space cannot connected with anything like they did by making the space-time concept and as they dragged the space-time concept to Big Bang then where was aether as at present where from Dark Matter & Dark Energy has come? Once aether is confirmed light/radiation is an electromagnetic wave motion due to the vibrations of electric dipoles,, theory of relativity is baseless, E=mc^2 is fundamentally incorrect, space-time concept is absolute rubbish and all forces of nature are electromagnetic forces, Newtons laws are not universal laws, every star system has its time frame and different gravitation property depending upon the recessional motion of star system and all problems of physics are resolved. I don't believe mathematics should define physics as mathematics should be a tool in the hands of physics.
THAT IS WHY I CALL MYSELF A PHILOSOPHER
@ Managers of all discussions on ResearchGate
I have not the answer but a question. Could you share this with all the members of ResearchGate, if yes then do it.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude