Please, follow the center line strategy.

HGD

. The problem of belonging of islets between Romania and Bulgaria as a result of the withdrawal of the Danube River, caused by global warming, natural disasters and human effects, is a complex issue that requires a detailed legal analysis. According to 1982, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the ownership of islets is determined by the principle of natural prolongation, which states that the territorial sea of a state extends to the outermost point of its coastal landmass. In the case of an islet, the state to which it is naturally attached is considered to have sovereignty over it. In the case of Romania and Bulgaria, the Romanian and Bulgarian sides have different approaches to the issue. The Romanian side argues that the islets should be considered Romanian territory since they are naturally attached to the Romanian coast. The Bulgarian side, however, claims that the islets are naturally attached to the Bulgarian coast, and therefore should be considered Bulgarian territory. In addition, both sides have proposed different solutions to the dispute. The Romanian side has proposed that the islets should be divided between the two countries, with each country having sovereignty over half of the islets. The Bulgarian side has proposed that the islets should be considered international waters and that both countries should have equal access to them. Ultimately, the issue of the ownership of the islets must be resolved through negotiations between Romania and Bulgaria, and a final decision should be based on the principle of natural prolongation.,

I think largely, the land particles resulting from the withdrawal of the Danube would be subject to the border agreement between Romania and Bulgaria and would be assigned to either country based on the terms of that agreement.