I am working on Dynamic impact of workers' remittances on economic growth of Sri Lanka as research. In which, i want to use a theory part. Therefore, i want to know which theory can i use? please direct me
It seems that you may want to distinguish whether the remittance is used for consumption or investment purposes. The latter may have a direct multiplier effect on growth. A sense of whether the remittance is going to high income or low income recipients can help as high income persons are most likely to save it, which will be channeled into investments.
Given the levels of savings achieved thru remittance, one can then use a development model of growth embedded in a neoclassical framework. See for instance W. W. Rostow’s “Theorists of Economic Growth from David Hume to Present,” Oxford Press, 1990 (Appendix) and Table A.II.4 on p.541.
Ahamed: The fact that your research centers on economic implies that you need to, academically or otherwise, have to revisit the economic growth models. From Harod-Domar, Solow's Growth model and now the neoclassical growth theories, a review will perfectly guide you on which model is, justifiable and applicable to your research agenda. Generally, remittances in my view, are going to be one of the regressors for whatever model you may finally adopt or develop and subsequently employ. Second and most important, your specific objective/intention of the study should guide you as well.
Benard is right. It is advisable that you make a through review of all studies concerning economic growth. However, to confine the survey to period from Harrod-Domar to the neoclassical growth theories is too narrow and it is doubtful if the survey gives Ahamed a really useful insight on economic growth.
It will be wiser to read at first two survey papers written by Kurz and Salvadori below. The two surveys are widely read. The draft version of Old and New paper is read more than 500 every week for a long time. Last week (ending December 4) it received 868 "reads."
The readers seems to be students from Subsaharan countries and India. "Reads" from Sri Lnaka seems to be small.
Although the two surveys are splendid, the state of the growth theory is not as splendid as the survey papers. I have written a bit long "comments" on two surveys (see the paper below). It is a kind of critical review of the current growth theories.
References:
Kurz, H.D., and N. Salvadori (2003) Theories of Economic Growth: Old and New, in Neri Salvadori (Ed.) The Theory of Economic Growth: a “Classical” Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, May 2003. Chapter 1, pp.1-22.
Published version: http://growthbook2.ec.unipi.it/papersLibro/KurzSalvadori.pdf
Kurz, H.D., and N. Salvadori (2008) New Growth Theory and Development Economics, in Amitava Krishna Dutt and Jaime Ros (Eds.) International Handbook of Development Economics, Volumes 1 and 2. September 2008. Chapter 15, pp.207-222.
Neri Salvadori and I are extremely pleased and deeply grateful to a scholar of the reputation and stature of Professor Yoshinori Shiozawa to say such nice things about our work on growth theory. Many thanks indeed.
I recomend to used the MRW grown model or extend Solow s model. Review the econometric way is develop the model. ITs OLS regression with tranversal data from most countries in the world, run with Stata Software. Take look the link below .