The DnaSP v6 program allows to estimate statistical significance for Tajima's D by two ways:

1. assuming that it follows the beta distribution

2. by coalescent simulations

When I do the Tajima's test in standard method, I get “Not significant, 0.10 > P > 0.05” result.

But when I do coalescent simulations provided Standard Neutral Model, this Tajima's D value appears to be significant (p=0,011*).

How could it be and how should I interpret this?

I might have used incorrect parameters for coalescent simulations, but all the parameters were estimated for my sample in the same program.

Please, help me to understand.

Thank you in advance!

Similar questions and discussions