Dear Nazime Tuncay,

"digital life/identity after death" is a very important and broad issue that has long been discussed.

See, for example:

https://www.dignitymemorial.com/fr-ca/support-friends-and-family/digital-footprint-after-death

https://www.thebridgechronicle.com/tech/digital-footprints-after-death-photos-messages-social-media-security

https://medium.com/the-storm-of-words-un-said/digital-afterlife-what-happens-to-our-online-data-when-we-die-6be23e8dd501

https://medium.com/@ayesha.siddiqa2197/the-concept-of-digital-afterlife-what-happens-to-your-data-and-online-identity-after-you-die-95458b12aa51

Best regards

Anatol Badach

Thank you very much for your contribution! Very useful links

Ready or not, the digital afterlife is here

By training a large language model (LLM) on a person’s text messages and voice recordings, several software firms are offering access to ‘griefbots’ — digital recreations of a person that allow their relatives to communicate ‘with them’ after their death...

Developers of griefbots say that they help people by allowing them to commune with recreations of the dead, but others say that the technology is fraught with danger...

"Interactive digital recreations of people who have died are known by various names: deathbots, thanabots, ghostbots and, perhaps most commonly, griefbots. Nolan created Dadbot by combining the chatbot ChatGPT with a voice-modelling program made by AI software firm ElevenLabs in New York City. But there are now more than half a dozen platforms that offer this service straight out of the box, and developers say that millions of people are using them to text, call or otherwise interact with recreations of the deceased.

Proponents of the technology think that it comforts people in mourning. Sceptics suggest that it could complicate the grieving process. Despite a rapid uptake of this technology in the past few years, there is scant research so far to prove that either group is correct..."

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02940-w