Today, I published an article about First Motion. It is based on the notion that all matter is always on the move; how there is no matter that exists at a standstill.
Then, viewing Einstein's GR, this motion is not incorporated in his work. As a result, we long for an ether, or a spacetime with properties of its own, to explain all motions of matter.
For instance, there needs to be more gravity to hold a galaxy together if we follow Einstein's GR. Yet with First Motion, all known gravity is indeed all we need.
Will you engage me in a discussion on this subject matter? Did Einstein miss out on the most important motion that matter is involved in?
Find attached the article I published today. Note that Einstein's mathematical framework is not in question. Rather, the First Motion turns that framework inside out (and remains correct therefore). All of a sudden, there is no need anymore for all that extra gravity to hold a galaxy together.
Thank you for your help in discussing this question.
The Big Bang motion is only one of many different solutions of the Einstein field equations. The metric including the Big Bang describes only homogeneos isotropic models of the Universe, called Friedmannian models. All Friedmannian models are obtained by the conditions according to which the 3-space of the Universe: 1) does not hve a gravitationl field; 2) does not rotate. It can only deform. Friedmannian comologicl models are linked to the theory of the Big Bang. But the Einstein equations can describe in principle many different gravitational fields: gravitating, rotating, deforming. It is possible to obtain the redshift in the framework of other fields equations, for example, de Sitter's ones. Moreover, it is impossible to consider the Universe, where gravitational field does not exist! The theory of the Big Bang is only one many possible solutions of the Einstein equations. Friedmannian cosmology does not linclude such phenomena as the collapse of material bodies, the rotation of planets, stars, galaxies...
Thank you for this reply, Larissa, but your good information is addressing the surrounding realities and not the exact mechanism as proposed. The specifics of the exact proposal appear not understood.
Indeed, the universe is not a medium in this proposal (i.e. the universe itself does not have a gravitational field).
The proposal is therefore fully focused on the behaviors of matter while this is moving through space. To appreciate this, one should pause all other scientific thoughts about space and spacetime. The focus is truly based on the mechanisms of matter.
Four distinct motions for matter moving through space are identified, and one of these motions is declared as non-gravitational, whereas the three other motions are identified as gravity informed.
Among these four motions of matter, the one not based on gravity is the prime mover; it is the 'sent-off' push that the materialization process (Big Bang) caused to happen for matter and that is ongoing. It is the fastest speed that matter is involved in.
The visualization of just planet Earth in these four motions is (going from smallest/slowest to largest/fastest):
4. Earth spinning
3. Earth revolving around Sun
2. Earth moving together with Milky Way in its circular motion
1. Earth speeding in a single direction, away from where it all started for this matter/energy.
That First Motion (fourth in the list) applies to all matter in the universe. There exists no matter in the universe at a standstill. One of the motions is a straight line through space, the other motions are circular/elliptical in essence.
This means that all matter in a galaxy is also involved in that prime mover. As such, the group reality of a galaxy is not just based on gravity. That is the specific point of the article.
So thank you once more for replying and providing good information. The specific point the article is trying to show is that matter already by itself is involved in gravitational and non-gravitational behaviors.