I will have a look at your paper (I believe in the use of Clifford algebra more generally). I have proven the basic axioms of Quantum Mechanics from general hypothesis (see my paper).

It is interesting. Let me know. See the different my papers on bare bone skeleton of quantum mechanics by using Clifford algebra, and in particular that one on International Journal of Theoretical Physics. It is interesting also the journal Clifford Analysis, Clifford algebras and their Applications (CACA).

Sorry , I forgot to mention... also Journal Article: An Investigation on the Basic Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by Using the Clifford Algebra

Elio Conte

[show abstract]

Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics. 01/2011; 5(11):485-544

is available on the list.

Dirac was one of the gratest Quantun physicists ever, he did not consider anything in the classical sense.

Then?

To Elio : could you put some of your works on this site, so that they can be accessible ?

Dirac, maybe he had other perceptions, but he realized that we had moved beyond our percetion and we need to depend on theory, in his tme, and today on very large and expansive machines to show the actual composition of the universe.

Jean, looking at the list of my publications you find a number of publications and as example :

Journal Article: An Investigation on the Basic Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by Using the Clifford Algebra

Elio Conte

[show abstract]

Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics. 01/2011; 5(11):485-544.

This may be of some interest.

Gerard , you are right. Quantum mechanics is out of classical analogies as Dirac observed from its starting of the theory