Over the past 55 years, hundreds of experiments have been conducted to determine the value of the Newtonian constant of gravitation. The data obtained in various experiments have a significant spread of values of this constant, and its accuracy has increased by only one order of magnitude. This fundamental constant has the lowest accuracy among all fundamental constants. Perhaps, in relation to this constant, the analytical method of research, which is usually auxiliary, should be made the main one. In the article:
"An analytical method for increasing the accuracy of the value of the Newtonian constant of gravitation." https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385546538_An_analytical_method_for_increasing_the_accuracy_of_the_value_of_the_Newtonian_constant_of_gravitation
an analytical method for increasing the accuracy of the value of the Newtonian constant of gravitation is proposed. This method EXCLUSIVELY on CODATA 2022 data and known physical laws allowed to increase the accuracy of the value of the Newtonian constant of gravity by 7 orders of magnitude at once. I would like to emphasize once again that this actually revolutionary breakthrough is based not on various kinds of physical and mathematical constructions, but exclusively on official data on the values of physical constants presented in the CODATA listing.
In addition to Newton's constant of gravity, the accuracy of Planck's mass, length, and time has also been significantly improved.
Dear Valery do you really think one or two-dimensions of Newton equation that it does not recognize temperature, pressure can describe three-dimensions of nature that it is changing constantly? Article The Mythos of Gravity Or (Newtonian and Einsteinian Gravity is a Myth)
Yes, I made several discoveries in fundamental physics that helped me refine our understanding of Newton's Big-G. Turns out it is NOT constant throughout the age of the universe. (I also found a fundamental fatal flaw in the Friedmann metric (FLRW-metric) but that paper is being written and will be released in about 10 days.). But for now, please reference this image taken from my physics calculator software. (For more details and in-depth cosmological insights please see TrueCosmology.info)
Dear Valery Timkov ,
I did a simple series of experiments in China. Which can be used to prove that Newton's theory of gravitational interaction at a distance is wrong.
The experiments were done to prove my prediction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5dZ3VQXf6A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C219qZU9dOU&t=117s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URLzVTfA0_I
The next video was made with two days before of experiments beginning:
So, the Newton's gravitational constants have to be changed as you change the place of experiments.
Regards,
Laszlo
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Phytochemistry
- Extracts