Hi,
I'm a PhD student and my tutor wants me to be a second author of the most important paper of my thesis. I did a significant amount of work ( clean database, phenotyping, statistical analysis, qtl detection ... ) and because a colleague created the map for the detection of QTLs, she wants him to be the first author of the paper. I don't question the work he did but my question is for my future, is there a significant difference between a second author and a co-author ?
Thanks,
Have a great day.
In principle, it shouldn't, since both contributed to the paper. In reality it does make a difference (usually in conversations were recall will be towards the first author).
What I would suggest is that, if you feel really uncomfortable with the issue is that you politely suggest an importance matrix. List your contributions and your colleagues with an importance scale. You will see that the discussion will center and narrowed down to the importance parameter were, if seen on paper, can be more clearly be brought into focus.
In most disciplines the order of authors is very important, and should have been discussed before starting the project. Some disciplines have guidelines. Also, some universities may requires that you are the first author if it is central for your PhD dissertation. The role of the adviser is to advice.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning