There is a notable divergence of opinion with regard to the desirability of climate policy, the sources of funding for renewable energy investments, and the urgency of combating global warming. The objective of this article is to examine the underlying causes of these discrepancies and to suggest potential solutions that might facilitate more in-depth discussions among the scientific community, policymakers, and the public.

• A substantial body of scientific evidence indicates that global warming is a discernible trend and that rising temperatures present a significant risk to ecosystems, human health, and economic activity. Governments, international organisations and non-governmental organisations are engaged in active research and the implementation of measures designed to combat climate change. Nevertheless, there remains considerable debate surrounding the optimal means of addressing this challenge. This article will examine the intricate interrelationship between climate policy formulation, the necessity for investment in renewable energy sources, and the imperative of combating global warming.
• The scientific evidence for climate change is becoming increasingly compelling, thereby underscoring the urgency of global warming. Nevertheless, discrepancies in public awareness, policy priorities and industry interests have resulted in some countries' response measures being less prompt than the scientific recommendations would suggest. To illustrate, some policymakers or companies may fail to consider the long-term environmental consequences in pursuit of immediate gains, thereby failing to take into account the potential long-term implications of their actions.