I am planning a study with the following two steps and would appreciate your guidance:
Screening phase: Interview participants for respiratory symptoms \ St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Those with a total SGRQ score > 25 will then undergo pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Is this sequential approach—from symptom questionnaire to PFT—appropriate and widely accepted?
Field diagnostics: In community or field settings, which diagnostic tool do you consider the most reliable and practical for identifying chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs)?
Both alternatives are possible, depending on the nature of your research question. What are your research questions? Is this prevalence and incidence? - There will be option 2 with a follow-up. If you want to study how the PFT method corresponds with the questionnaire, and/or outcomes of people with respiratory symptoms, it is option 1.
Thank you, ma'am, for your response. Our study has only 1 objective: prevalence and determinants of chronic respiratory illnesses in India. We need your guidance on which screening tool and diagnostic can fulfil our objective criteria
Start with validated questionnaire (eg; SGRQ). Is this questionnaire and scoring done by trained research person or by the participant? Smoking history and occupational history should be recorded.
Next step: check correlation of SGRQ score with PFT in a sample size (>100). (advise include those with both high and low scores)
Based on the above you can decide whether both are needed or questionnaire alone will suffice.