I would be very careful and be sure of what Data is being released and in what form, be it sanitized, even low numbers with a small geographical area presents with potential identification of individuals. I can't stress enough, given the opaque closed source nature of the even supposedly "Open AI", which is far from.bring the open platform. It is increasingly attractive to be "early adopters" of potentially disruptive technologies and those which have enormous promise but the unbreakable rules regarding confidentially and the protection of the patients, must be given a absolute full review against the baseline ethical principles upon which our effectivness is alway being hit with data breaches and disclosures. This causes stress, ansgt, and distrust of doctors and the medical/pharmaceutical complex and encourages conspiracy theories and groups of people who have run from the people tryinf to help them (ground epidemiologist in the near recent and long Ebola Outbreak in Western Africa. A lot of care and trust management efforts should be out into place to restore the population's trust in caregivers. As a whole these caregivers, doctors, and scientists do have the public and individual patient's best interests and seek to achieve positive outcomes. But be remainded the Trust is earned. Is easy to lose, and though it can be regained, it is s very long and difficult path. After the mistakes, folly, and subsequent failure of the trusts relationship during the above epidemic. A team I was working with attempted to solve the inherent intrusive nature of contact tracing in a world of mass surveillance as potential contects, so afraid due to misinformation and conspiracy, in part due to lack of effective health emergency communications, were left with a void of reliable Informationen. This provides a door so big a train of conspiracy went driving through delivering a flood of outlandish claims (one bring them that vaccines contain aluminum preservtibe which was an "antenna" to communicate with Bill Gates. This came from the mount of a board certified pediatrician. The already present iron in you blood is a far better antenna. The point being as we seek to use technology, and new ones, careful attension must be paid to understanding exactly how it works and effectivly communicating thst to the public before people are left to make assumptions and suppositon. We envisioned an advanced contract tracing method using the tools of mass surveillance but wrapping the how, when, and where in a Blockchain encryption, where the system would only deliver "contacts" not the potentially private and and sources with high abuse potential concealed and not available for any other purpose, nor available for backward looking research, to rapidly increee the the Context trwcing, protecting vulnerable people, the vulnerable boots on the ground, and removing any potential for the tempting misuse of the data for anything other then that which exempts said data from the definition of "human research" while removing the potential for pressure to be applied by a local government, law enforcement, and other govermental uses outside the scope of the U.S..Common Rule exempting "forward looking only" epidemiological contact tracing from the definition of "research of human subjects" which allows the more rapid adoption of new technologies and surveillance without sacrificing speed, ground staff safety and equally important and often not well communicated the person's individual privacy concerns. The latter can and had shown to habe the most delirious effects on trust, opens the door for misinformation, and harms the whole effort increasing overall speed and efficacy. So, tred but tred carefully on there new tools especially where the functioning and data collection by the holders of sources code is being treated as a national security matter. This is counter productive and csnlewd to very serious loss of freut end confidece levels so well illuminated in the past and ongoing pandemic was vaccine roll out. It was shocking that the nation-states allowed the non-disclosure of the ingredients. Equally, the roll out of a human trial, which was a phase I (one) through 3 (three), multi-center clinical trials with seriously difficent state supported lack of "informed consent" without just bring honest with the population shows a serious communications failure and opened the door of the absurd commentary about aluminum antennas and the hundred other equally disturbing conspiracies which were in fact the failure of those running the otogrems to coordinate and communicate well with the public as one of the several ways to diffuse conspiracy and to bolster trust. Require the full disclosure by the ChatPT (and I hesitate strongly as a Philosophy graduate to use common anthropomorphisms thrown around without meaning or understandinf of A.I., M.L., Neural Networks, and Quantum anything). Be careful in your buzz word chocies as all of the above rest on shaky if not complete nonsensical foundations.

John Lawton Mcbrayer I'm glad to see that you have shared your concerns about the need to be cautious when using new technology. You emphasized the importance of ethical principles and protecting patients' privacy, which are issues that are worth paying attention to. Before adopting new technology, we need to conduct in-depth research and comprehensive evaluations to ensure that it does not infringe on human rights and privacy. At the same time, we need to actively communicate with the public and establish transparency and trust, which are key factors in ensuring the smooth and successful application of technology.

In addition, we should embrace the development of technology and engage in thorough assumptions and validation throughout the process. The development of ChatGPT can undoubtedly reduce some repetitive work, such as office work. However, if it is used to assist scientific research, this issue needs further explanation.