When a reviewer suggests that the results should be interpreted with physical significance in the context of chaotic image encryption, it typically means that the author should provide a clear explanation of how the chaotic system relates to the physical process of image encryption.

In other words, the reviewer is asking to justify how the proposed chaotic system can be effectively used for image encryption in practice. This may involve discussing the underlying principles of image encryption and demonstrating how the chaotic system can be integrated into the encryption process.

As the author, you can respond to this comment by explaining the physical significance of the proposed chaotic system in the context of image encryption. You could also offer experimental or theoretical evidence to support the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method for image encryption.

To provide experimental or theoretical evidence to support the validity and effectiveness of a proposed chaotic system for image encryption, you can consider the following:

In response to the reviewer's comment regarding the need for interpreting the results of the chaotic image encryption with physical significance, it is important to consider the underlying principles and practical implications of the designed one-dimensional chaotic system. While chaotic systems are often used for their complex dynamics and robustness in encryption algorithms, interpreting the results in terms of physical significance can provide deeper insights into the system's behavior and potential applications. By exploring the physical implications, one can analyze the system's sensitivity to initial conditions, its attractor structure, and its potential resemblance or analogies to physical phenomena observed in other domains. This interpretation can enhance our understanding of the system's behavior and aid in further investigations, enabling potential connections to be established between the abstract concepts of chaos theory and tangible physical phenomena.