It is possible, using dominant system equality and freedom theory to map the structure of the market model in China before and after the fall of red socialism in 1991, and this raises the question, Can you see the structure of the 1991 flip from red socialism to non-democratic capitalism in China in terms of equality and freedom?
If you can see the structure of the flip please share it.
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
Note:
It is best stating the structure of red socialisl and non-democratic capitalism in terms of equality and freedom separately and then comparing them to see the context of the 1991 flip in those terms
Since the fall of the Chinese monarchy and the revolution more than one hundred years ago, China has never been a socialist state. it has always been fascist. This can be seen in the number of peasants killed by government policies, that is, Mao Tse Tung's ideas, in the so called 'great leap forward', many of whom died from starvation.
I have taught many Chinese students in the UK, and their lack of understanding of any concept other than what the Chinese government wants them to know is staggering. they have no concept of democracy. I don't see in the for seeable future, any Chinese government moving towards a more democratic style of government in the sense that we know it here in the west.
Dear Valerie, thank you for taking the time to write.
Please take a careful look at the nature of the question, it is about the 1991 flip from red socialism since 1991 to non-democratic capitalism after the fall of Karl Marx's world and this does not require any knowledge of democracy as it is a shift from a social dictatorship to an economic dictatorship, but question is being asked from the point of view of shifting responsibility in terms of equality and freedom.
Can you please used your ideas and place them in the context of equality and freedom needed to be able to see the answer of the relevant question here and then share it: Can you see the structure of the 1991 flip from red socialism to non-democratic capitalism in China in terms of equality and freedom?
If you can see the structure of the 1991 flip please share it
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
Ange, can you state then the structure of those 3 models in simple analytical terms in terms of equality and freedom to compare them? if Yes, please share those structures
Keep in mind, if you are familiar with perfect and imperfect shift/flip theory you can see perfect and imperfect paradigm flips and perfect and imperfect paradigm flip backs between those 3 models.
Keep in mind too, that all these models have specific sorts of equality or inequality or externality neutrality assumptions under which they work.
Dear Ange, good day, Thank you for writing and see you are familiar with related material by me. My goal this year is to expand those ideas in terms of equality and freedom.
I have written and share several articles on how to give structure to all possible dominant component based development models, and link those structures to paradigm shift and paradigm shift theory from the point of view of dominant component equality and freedom.... For example, red socialism as you know it is a social equality without freedom model so you can represent it by a social dictatorship structure. Democratic capitalism is an economic freedom without equality model so you can represent it as a liberal economy model. Non-democratic capitalism is an economy without freedom and equality so you can represent it as an economic dictatorship.
Once you know how to write or express those structures in terms of dominant component equality and freedom, then you can provide analytical support to all the things you listed in your comment as well as be able to answer the current question using this freedom and equality thinking.
One of my goals this year is to expand these ideas and apply them for example to state the paradigm evolution path of red socialism had it had been able to win the cold war by going economy friendly and what would have come next and what is at the end or to state the paradigm evolution path of non-democratic capitalism if it were to outsmart democratic capitalism and what would come next and what is at the end or what is the paradigm evolution path of democratic capitalism if it loses to non-democratic capitalism and what comes next and what is at the end.
Attached I shared the figure 3 of a paper I am working on to present the theory on where to base and complete those goals of the year mentioned above, notice that democratic capitalism(DC), red socialism(RS), and non-democratic capitalism(NDC) are not yet represented there in terms of equality and freedom:
How the models needed to answer the relevant question here can be stated in terms of equality and freedom and how paradigm evolution in this case is expected to work can be found at:
Sustainability thoughts 151: An overview of market variability based on dominant component equality and freedom: What is the structure of a true perfect market?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354831075_Sustainability_thoughts_151_An_overview_of_market_variability_based_on_dominant_component_equality_and_freedom_What_is_the_structure_of_a_true_perfect_market
Sustainability thoughts 152: How to highlight the four market structures that dominant component markets can have in terms of equality and freedom variability when under externality neutrality assumptions and without them?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356841470_Sustainability_thoughts_152_How_to_highlight_the_four_market_structures_that_dominant_component_markets_can_have_in_terms_of_equality_and_freedom_variability_when_under_externality_neutrality_assumpti
Sustainability thoughts 138: How does a general red socialism market evolution model is expected to work? The cases of expanding red socialism, of saving red socialism from collapse, and the case of the fall of red socialism due to binding economic sustainability pressures
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358138833_Sustainability_thoughts_138_How_does_a_general_red_socialism_market_evolution_model_is_expected_to_work_The_cases_of_expanding_red_socialism_of_saving_red_socialism_from_collapse_and_the_case_of_the_f
Sustainability thoughts 135: How can a general paradigm evolution model aimed at capturing all possible market evolution routes in response to binding sustainability gap pressures be stated step by step?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352476713_Sustainability_thoughts_135_How_can_a_general_paradigm_evolution_model_aimed_at_capturing_all_possible_market_evolution_routes_in_response_to_binding_sustainability_gap_pressures_be_stated_step_by_ste
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction