I am developing a survey study to better understand the effect taking the Clifton StrengthsFinder (CFS) 2.0 instrument and subsequent instruction has on the self-awareness, self-efficacy, and relationship development of undergraduate students. I would like to identify questionnaire items which have been used in other research to study these constructs. Thank you for your kind assistance!
Dear Carpl,
Hope this will help you:
Conference Paper Beyond relationship satisfaction: The development of the rel...
Research Assessing perceived ability to cope with trauma: A multigrou...
Article Function Self-Efficacy Scale--FSES: Development, Evaluation,...
Article The relationships between interoception and alexithymic trai...
Try this one, Scales pages 88-91:
http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/37/dissertation.pdf;jsessionid=8643BA59934315C9E50078E8C5F08557?sequence=1
Also this one published 2015, pages 12-30
http://ijemst.com/pdfgoster.php?file=depo/pdfs/pdf_3_2015_2.pdf
In general, measuring self-efficacy as a generalized construct is not advisable, rather as Bandura suggests, it should be measured in relation to specific areas of action that one is interested in studying.
Not sure this is really helpful as a comment, but I've personally used generalized self-efficacy questionnaires and they have rarely given me meaningful data - especially when performing ANCOVA's or any type of regression analysis.
In general, measuring self-efficacy as a generalized construct is not advisable, rather as Bandura suggests, it should be measured in relation to specific areas of action that one is interested in studying.
Not sure this is really helpful as a comment, but I've personally used generalized self-efficacy questionnaires and they have rarely given me meaningful data - especially when performing ANCOVA's or any type of regression analysis.
I pick up the issue of task specific and generalized self-efficacy and drive attention to the specificity level among measurements. Thus, generalized self-efficacy fits the overall personal talent while task specific self-efficacy is appropriate for specific areas of strength measured by the CFS 2.0 instrument. Bandura (2006) provided a Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales, in Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, and many self-efficacy scales with their psychometrics are available in the published literature. An Academic Self-Efficacy Scale might work well for your research but it is an example of a general measure. A Social Self-Efficacy Scale, as example of specific measure, would fit at least one area of the CFS 2.0.
Best
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Applied Statistics
- Survey Design
- Questionnaire