I continue to develop the powerful “voltage compensation” idea by asking more and more questions about its ubiquitous implementations. So far, we have considered how to virtually decrease the resistance (almost) up to zero thus making an “ideal” ammeter and a current-to-voltage converter (transimpedance amplifier):
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_do_we_improve_the_real_ammeter_How_do_we_create_an_almost_ideal_ammeter_What_does_the_op-amp_really_do_in_the_circuit_of_an_op-amp_ammeter?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_there_any_connection_between_the_humble_resistor_and_the_transimpedance_amplifier_What_does_the_op-amp_really_do_in_this_electronic_circuit?
Now it is interesting to see if we can apply this trick to the time-dependent capacitor. Let’s try.
People get an impression of the capacity by observing the voltage across the capacitor when charging it - the larger the capacity, the lower the voltage (at the same moment of the time). So, if we add a voltage that is a part of the voltage drop across the capacitor, we will create the illusion that the capacity has increased... and if the additional voltage is equal to the voltage drop, we will create an even stronger illusion that the capacity has become infinite! People like illusions, so let's give them that pleasure:-)
So, let’s add a humble variable voltage source in series with the capacitor and adjust its voltage equal to the voltage drop across the capacitor. As a result, the voltage drop as though disappears. What a magic - the people continue charging the capacitor but its voltage stays zero as though the capacitance has become infinite! They may even try to use this huge capacitor as a source of energy... but is this possible?
Finally, to obtain a real circuit, we just replace the “helping” voltage source with a properly supplied op-amp and make it “observe” the difference between the voltage drop across the capacitor and its output voltage... and change the latter so that to keep the virtual ground. Practically, this means to connect the capacitor between the op-amp output and its inverting input and to inject the input current into the node at the inverting input. As a result, its output voltage will always be equal to the voltage drop and the voltage across the whole network (seen by the input source) will be almost zero. Thus we have used a real capacitor to create a “virtual capacitor” with multiplied capacitance (the convential name of this circuit is “current integrator”).
http://www.circuit-fantasia.com/tutorial/intro/question4.swf
In this circuit, like in the op-amp ammeter and transimpedance amplifier, the op-amp output voltage (energy) is a “mirror” copy of the voltage drop (loss) across the capacitor and the current is the same. So, we have two elements with equal voltages and currents – the first is a real capacitor consuming a voltage while the second is a voltage source producing the same voltage. Then can we say the op-amp is a "negative capacitor" and the whole circuit is an "infinite capacitor"? Or, even more figuratively, the current integrator is a "neutralized positive capacitor"? If so, it would be a good prelude to the subject of negative capacitor...
You probably have already guessed that this is a story about the ubiquitous Miller effect; see also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Miller_effect#How_to_modify_impedance
What do you think about it? Have you ever seen such an explanation before? Is it reliable? Is it useful for understanding compared with the conventional Miller effect explanation? I expect your opinion. Cyril