We think that Pi is not the ideal constant to relate the constants of physics. We think that it should be replaced by a more adequate constant, for example a possible cosmological constant, to achieve unified physics.

I think that the new constant should be very close to Pi but a little bit inferior.

Jamil Kooli My view is that where the constant Pi arises in physics it is because of the wave properties of radiation and matter. When we are dealing with sine curve type variations, the constant Pi arises naturally.

Data Prerecording of Conference Presentation on the Unification of Physics

Richard

Dear Richrad Lewis, my opinion is that all the equations of the constants of a unified physics must be as a function of cosmological constants and Pi should only be a constant of a circle no more. For example the Parsec is a function of Pi but that is geometry. The Schwarzschild radius is not a function of Pi it is a function of the speed of light squared but that is physics reasoning by mathematical models so there is a theory that covers it. It is quite clear that the speed of light is a universal unit of measurement. At the end of the last century people understood that in modern physics the "meter" must be connected to the speed of light and this was done before the end of the year 2000. People should not contradict each other, I mean that on the one hand they measure a wavelength using Pi (this is the case of the Compton wavelength) and on the other hand they adopt the speed of light as the unit of measurement of the meter. In short, there is something wrong with physics. Besides, I don't know yet if the precise value of the astronomical unit emerges from an equation or a direct measurement, what do we think it will be as a function of Pi or as a function of the speed of light or as a function of something else? In my opinion it will never be a function of Pi and even if it is not directly related to the constant of the speed of light it will be related to this constant indirectly. But physicists, especially at the beginning of the last century, did their job well with the on-board means they had at their disposal. They found that Pi solves their problems when they move from laboratory tests to formulating constants and they found that the 1/137 ratio (fine structure) solves other problems for them as well. There are attempts here to solve certain problems by the means on board but in the absence of a theory that connects everything. In Einstein's equations for gravity his equations are a function of Pi and that's because he uses geometry and Pi is a constant that comes from the geometry of the circle so no contradiction. Finally, I think that a length can never be linked to the constant Pi if not the geometry will no longer make sense. In my opinion Pi must be retired for such a subject.