Can we stop global climate change? Does human scientific power reach the world's climate change? How do researchers respond?
As you know, humans are very intelligent and can predict the future climate of the world with hydrology, climatology and paleontology. But don't countries, especially industrialized countries, that produce the most harmful gases in the earth's atmosphere and think about the future of the earth's atmosphere? Do they listen to the research of climatologists? What would have to happen to force them to listen to climate scientists?
Miloud Chakit added a reply
Climate change is an important and complex global challenge, and scientific theories about it are based on extensive research and evidence. The future path of the world depends on various factors including human actions, political decisions and international cooperation.
Efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change continue. While complete reversal may be challenging, important steps can be taken to slow progression and lessen its effects. This requires global cooperation, sustainable practices and the development and implementation of clean energy technologies.
Human scientific abilities play an important role, but dealing with climate change also requires social, economic and political changes. The goal is to limit global warming and its associated impacts, and collective action at the local, national, and international levels is essential for a more sustainable future.
Reply to this discussion.
Osama Bahnas added a reply
It is impossible to stop global climate change. The human scientific power can not reach the world's climate change.
Borys Kapochkin added a reply
Mathematical models of increasing planetary temperature as a function of the argument - anthropogenic influence - are erroneous.
Alastair Bain McDonald added a reply
We could stop climate change but we won't! We have the scientific knowldge but not the political will. One could blame Russia and China from refusing to cooperate but half the population of the USA (Republicans) deny climate change is a problem and prefer their profligate life styles.
John Hatzopoulos added a reply
John Hatzopoulos
PhD, MSCE, UW USA, Diploma NTUA GreeceManaging Director at University of the Aegean
Greece
All climate change has been loaded on the CO2 responsible for the greenhouse effect. Therefore, there must be scientific experiments from several independent scientific institutes worldwide to find out what the greenhouse impact is on various CO2 concentrations. Then, there must be a conference from a reliable, professional organization with the participation of all independent scientific institutions to establish standards on CO2 concentrations and propose political actions accordingly.
The second action that can be done is to plant as many trees and plants as possible to breathe the CO2 and free the oxygen. Stop any deforestation and plant trees immediately in any bunt areas.
Ilan Kelman added a reply
Ilan Kelman
For publications, see https://www.ilankelman.org/publications.htmlFor full contact details see https://www.ilankelman.org/contact.html at University College London
United Kingdom
See the full technical reports at https://www.ipcc.ch which details answers to all these questions.
Michael Senteza added a reply:
Humans have more capacity than they are utilising , and this is due to factors outside the realm of science. Politics and Capitalism or the quest to make more profit every day , has attenuated the ingenuity of humanity and innovation that could resolve lots of situations .
The changes we need is science without strings attached. We need to create innovative ways to deflect the trajectory of consumption and profitability to sustainability . typically the insatiable desire to control and make profits creates promotion and attachment to lifestyles and consumption habits that can be attributed to global worming .
A typical example is the dissolution of knit societies which meant that most schools, hospitals , markets , and movement offices where within walking distances before the metropolis ideology , mean that people didn't necessarily have to drive , the coming of virtualisation and remote work tools should mitigate unnecessary flights and a few other things we don't need urgently . the other example is we don't need beef every day , which means we just need enough cows of we follow nature and not commercials.
Most technologies are based on production processes that are so toxic that the result is not worth the risk , and yet we have not figured a way to mitigate the outcomes.
It can be done , but we need untainted scientists and thinkers to start the trend of fixing the anomaly
We can't stop it, because the reason - the core of the Earth is heating and degassing, we can't stop these processes.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Climate Science
- Climate Change