PCR is not restricted by the presence of viable organisms in the sample, thus rendering possible a retrospective diagnosis of tuberculosis from archival material with no cultural examination and whose storage in formalin severely hampers processing by usual bacteriological methods. After formalinized tissue specimen processing you can detect M. tuberculosis by acid-fast stain and can extract DNA , then amplified it by PCR.
As far as microbiological methods are concern; isolation is not possible from formalized tissue. Acid fast staining, histopathology and immunohistochemistry can be performed. Pcr can be uesd to detect the presence of bacterial DNA.
DNA extraction and PCR if, viable cell culture can not be performed.
Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens depends on microscopic examination (Zeihl-Neelsen stain (ZN-stain), and histopatholgy) but ZN-stain sensitivity is still of primary limitation and histopathological features of chronic granulomatous inflammation can be
found in various diseases other than TB. Accurate and early diagnosis of tuberculosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples is important for effective management. The present study aimed to compare between TB-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), ZN-stain, and histpathological examination for diagnosis of TB in formalin fixed histologic specimens. Out of fifty different tissue specimens clinically diagnosed as TB, ZN-stain was positive in (34%), histological examination was positive in (52%) and TBPCR was positive in (64%). TB-PCR was the most sensitive (100.0%) with specificity of 90.0% while sensitivity of ZN-stain was the lowest (50%). It was concluded that the PCR assay was more rapid, specific and reliable for TB diagnosis. In addition it should be implemented as routine test in histopathology as well as microbiology laboratories for the diagnosis of TB.
There is a need for rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in tissue specimens. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis was evaluated in 60 formalin-fixed tissue specimens, the target for the amplification being a segment of IS6110 in the M. tuberculosis chromosome. Of the 60 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens studied, 57 showed granulomatous inflammation and 53 had been cultured for mycobacteria; 10 were positive for M. tuberculosis and three were positive for other mycobacteria. Of 60 samples, 15 showed acid-fast bacilli on special staining. When done comparatively on a positive culture for M. tuberculosis, PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA in 60 tissue samples was 100% sensitive and 93% specific, having a positive predictive value of 76.9% and negative predictive value of 100%. PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA done on tissue samples was positive for 14 of 19 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis, negative for all six patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and negative for all 33 patients who had a diagnosis of a disease other than mycobacterial infection. When compared with the clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis, PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA in these patients' tissues was 73.6% sensitive and 100% specific, having a positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 88.6%. These data indicate that PCR amplification is useful for detecting M. tuberculosis DNA in formalin-fixed tissue specimens, and that it can be used to increase diagnostic accuracy in patients who have perplexing diagnostic problems associated with a granulomatous tissue response.