I have done a very simple Experiment to know the feasibility.though it is simple but it is proving that it will work.

See the link and search free energy experiment puja.vikramgupta

The link is https://youtu.be/F0ZdftNJikl

But if it doesn't work (there is an error)then search on YouTube free energy device puja.vikram Gupta

I would also like to know why it should not work ?can you please tell me only one reason .The experts are silent and confused because I have cleared all doubts raised by them.i challenge you that you cannot find a single flaw in this design.if there would be any flaw then the experts raise it certainly as they are already obsessed with physics laws.though it is working on physics laws.

I would like to tell you that in this design thermodynamics laws will not work

https://youtu.be/F0ZdftNJikl

Dear Sir,

I think you have proved it yourself as all masses will be in same position after one cycle,hence to repeat the cycle there will be need a very minimal input as seesaws are Balanced and all we know that if a seesaw is balanced then there is need of very minimal input to tilt it down.you are forgetting one thing that after unloading the mass the counter weight will work to generate energy.

But I reshoot the video .A wooden track and a Ball is sufficient to prove it.

https://youtu.be/F0ZdftNJikI

This time link is working.In this video consider the table as a second seesaw and cardboard piece as a middle seesaw.this middle seesaw will work like a bridge to direct the ball towards both sides.

https://youtu.be/F0ZdftNJikI

Ok! I will present a working model of it very soon but if a simple Experiment is sufficient to prove the thesis then it is depend on the reader that how he take it .It will be joke for but not for me.it is a matter of common Sense.There are many things in physics about them we don't know yet.The gravity in itself is a big mystery but do you have any proof about its source?Do you have any proof from where all the mass and energy came?

Thank you Sir! All know n physics laws are standing in support of this device and you say that it is against physics laws.There is no need of deep mathematics to prove it.The so called experiment (only for you but not me) is sufficient to prove it.in this machine if the mass is transporting from right to left seesaw and  left to right side seesaw with using minimal input and counterweight is falling down after unloading the mass then I don't think I will have to prove it more.But I will build it completely . furthermore you are talking about black hole .please don't worry no black hole will be created.These are only baseless concerns and these type of concerns also raised during CERN experiment.

Thank you again Sir for your time and discussions.

Dear Vikram Kumar Gupta,

My respons to your question is yes (and actually exist such powers using variation of Earth’s gravity field); but in reality they do not bypass the hermodinamics laws… Because in reality the real gravity field works under laws of tehrmodinamics.

In practice the answer is still no after hundreds of years and thousands of machines. As a principle there is a chance to convert energy from one form to another or from one place to another.

Bypass of the third law of Thermodynamics never happens. The second law is bypassed by non random processes and some types of biased machines. For example a focusing device collects cold microwaves into a hot spot, providing a source of power with out expelling other energy to a lower temperature receiver. We don't do much of this because a large device is needed for a small power supply.

Other examples use permanent magnets with claims of success, partially verified, but a small power supply is claimed from a large device. 

Dark current in diodes is a third example, also a small power supply and mostly nuisance.

So the rules and histories give you a fighting chance, but not efficiency or optimism.

 But in this machine it will be not happened.I have started work on it .

Dear Vikram Kumar Gupta,

I do not know what you do... If you have an excellent idea do it... My response was to the gravity origin. Perhaps you will make a such a machine which will use the variation of gravity field...

Dear Mr.Horvath,

Please see my experience finding 'free energy using gravity and balanced seesaw 'free to know what kind of machine It is.

Dear Vikram,

Please formulate your sentences clear: "free energy"(where it come,) "using gravity and balanced seesaw" (how it do?-explain it)"free to know what kind of machine it is"- First tell me what you mean on free energy, and how you get it? If you have right i will try to respond to your question. Now come back to your question: "Can we get infinite energy using gravity power and balanced mass as these together will work to bypass the thermodynamics laws". As you observe your question (can we get infinite energy using gravity power and balanced mass as these together will work to bypass the thermodynamics laws ) is not concordant to the statement:(free energy using gravity and balanced seesaw). So first clear your thought ...

My axiomatic statement is without using energy in a constant gravity field we cannot do machine which getting energy from this field... Only such a case if the gravity field is under change. 

Dear Mr.Horvath,

At first tell me have you understood the sketch and description ?

Dear Gert Van der Zwan Sir,

You are a great personality and I' m nothing before you.I request you if you could tell me answer of some following questions.

(1) If ball(mass) is rolling down towards left hand side seesaw  when right hand side seesaw tilts down then the ball will traveled the distance or not.if not ,why? Remember a middle seesaw will work as a bridge to direct the ball.

(2)If counterweight fall down after unloading the mass then it will work to generate energy or not.if not,why? remember a vertical stand is attached with counterweight arm to hold it in horizontal position.

(3)How much energy is required to tilteddown a BALANCED seesaw?

(4) How much energy will be generated when counterweight(10 kg.) Fall down on a spring based generator after unloading the mass.

(5)If it complete one cycle without any hurdle then it will be a overunity device or not.

I would like to tell you that after unloading the mass the right side seesaw will be no more a part of the system and will work like a free body.that's why the potential energy will be not same.

This is not irrelevant .you are giving example of Simon's beads machine but I would like to tell you that it is completely opposite of that law.where do you see that potential energy will be same after unloading the mass?OK!Here is a very simple example to understand it. 

Suppose a person is dropping 10 kg.mass from 1 meter height.now as per potential energy formula the P.E.will be 100 joule.if he again lift up this mass on same height then he will have to use 100 joule energy again.So in this case there is no gain.but what will be happened if the person is not using energy to lift up the mass again on same height or mass is getting same height due to itself power?then there will be gain or not?the same thing will be happened in this mechanism.after unloading the mass  the right seesaw will be no more part of the system for a moment and will work like a free system.the same mechanism will be happened when left seesaw will work after unload the mass.so where do you see Simon's law in this mechanism?

you say I should left some energy to store the mechanism again. But why should I. The gravity will work to restore the mechanism again. There is no need to store energy to restore the mechanism.  I don't think  that Simon law will work here.  You are also forgetting  the velocity of mass or kinetic energy  of mass which will also work to generate energy when the mass will hit a piston generator. 

But my request to you that tell me about the gain considering  above example. 

There is no need of deep mathematics. I can calculate it .There is nothing to calculate in this machine except output as input is very minimal and all work is being done by Gravity itself.

Thank you Sir!  Time will tell who is wrong ,who is right.

Finally very near to achieve overunity

Dear Members, See the attached link. https://youtu.be/NTKw2Hp6tPw

Now I explain in simple words how it will work. In the video you can see a seesaw having two ball each side .the red color ball side arm of seesaw is slightly heavier than green color side arm.the weight of each ball is 30 gram and weight of each box is 20 gram. The red ball is a counterweight and green ball will work to create energy. The green ball will be free to move but counterweight will be permanently mounted. Now I explain: When I lift the arm of green color ball up to a certain height and then you can see the movement of ball in the video that ball is moving due to a slope . But when I left the arm then the ball is getting back it's previous position or in other words the seesaw is getting back it's horizontal position due to overunity. It is totally against physics laws as ,as per physics laws the seesaw shouldn't get back it's horizontal position but in the video you can see it clearly. Now replace this ball with 10 kg.ball and counterweight 10.200 kg.and calculate input and output using potential energy formula. In this mechanism don't think about input as input will be very minimal but think about output. The movement of ball in the box will work as a output so the length of arm and length of box will be also important. The ball mass=10 kg. The length of arm is=1 meter The length of box is=80 cm. The width will be depend on the diameter of ball. Now calculations: Input is very minimal Output if a 10 kg ball will be rolled down from 80 cm height(though the height will be more) than using potential energy formula 10*10*.10=80 joule So the output will be 80 joule but input will be very minimal. I would like to insist on some following points. (1)the angle of box will be 45 degree downside(see the Sketch) (2) two piston generator will be mounted on the sidewall of the box. If still you have any doubts then please tell me. (3)there is overunity in this mechanism otherwise seesaw wouldn't get back it's horizontal position. I request you that if you any doubt regarding to understanding then please tell me as I am ready to clear your all doubts. Vikram Kumar Gupta

It´s funny see how allways the perpetual motion people forget that the energy doesn´t create from nothing, when you use a some kind of machine to generate movement you always be loose energy in form of heat, by the friction between parts and a molecular level, by internal friction, because you can´t do anything against the torsion of an axel rod when it is turning even if it torsion be very little, the friction generate heat that dilatate the material at molecular level increase the volume of the piece an if it has a milimetrical adjust will increase the friction an the loose by heat, that energy, you must compensate so that is the reason why a perpetual motion or free energy machine can´t work if you no feed it with another kind of energy to level the lost by heat, torsion, bending, friction at molecular level.

Dear Robert Carlous Sir,

You are forgetting one thing that the total energy and mass has come from nothing in the universe.

What is the source of energy ? From where all the mass and energy came if there was nothing in the universe?

Now you say friction but where do you see friction in this mechanism?

Discuss point to point about this mechanism.

You know very well that Gravity in itself is a powerful force and it will work to overcome any kind of friction or heat resistance in this mechanism wheather the temperature of mass is thousand degree.

In this mechanism the input is very minimal, potential energy is being increased,the Seesaw is getting back its original position without any external influence, friction and air resistance are not issue,Noether theorem will not work then why there is no overunity in this design?

Can you please explain?

If a tiny amount of work is being done to create a Large force and system is getting back its initial position without any extra energy then no one can stop it to get Overunity.

Discuss point to point in this mechanism with me .you will be convinced.

If you can create more from less, then that can be called a miracle, in your mechanism, want to see friction?. Well, first the axle, even it be a nail the wood make friction over it and vice versa, there you loose energy, second, the balls rubs everywhere in their boxes, even they were very light, there you have loose too, you can think that can move an airplane, maybe a ship or a car with a ruler and two balls?, and so when I see your mechanism suported by two knife edges in it axle and your hand away only for give some initial movement, and in 10 years later if the mechanism still moving maybe I´ll start believing that some perpetual motion machine or an over unit thing could work, meanwhile those machines are the most efficient to time loose, in that they are perpetual.The gravity over the planet only will help you when fall, to climb you need fight against the gravity, so you need energy, and if the universe came from nothing, so why you worry about nothing?, do nothing and maybe solve itself...

Dear Robert Carlous Sir,

In this kind of mechanism the friction between nail and scale will not create any issue as gravity will work and second you say that rubbing of ball with the wall of box to loose energy.

No there will be no lost of energy in this mechanism.

You can consult with any physicist regarding these two issues.

If friction and rubbing would be issues then the system would get back its original position without any external influence in first turn.

If you don´t understand the true nature of the physics, is like talk about gost, UFO, is a perpetual lost of time... menwhile you are in a gravitational system, the gravity not is an external influence, because, the force that you input is to beat the gravity and when it fall is due to the gravity not by any other extrange force created magically, and if it will climb again, it never will reach the same hight that it gained in the first atempt. Measure it, but with the system suported away from your hand.

Dear Roberto Carlos Sir,

What you are not understanding is that the system will not rotate at 360 degree as the Ball already has been rotate at 360 degree in the box after free fall from bottom of the box after getting vertical position.

The arm will move back and forth.

I have proven that the system is getting back its original position without any external influence after free falling of ball or in other words the arm is reversing after free fall of ball.

The potential energy is being increased and arm is being reversed without any extra energy then no one can stop to get overunity in this mechanism.

I will show you the free fall of a heavy ball and reversing of arm in my next video.

Yeha,

Bravo. I await a working prototype.

I note that your patent application relies on an electron moving at the speed of light.

This has not been seen in nature and would appear to be in conflict with all known experimental data and current thinking.

But if you can demonstrate it, all power to your elbow!

Dear Gert Van Der Swan Sir,

I am not wasting my time.i have achieved what I promised but it will take me some more time to build it completely.

I will prove myself very soon.

Just wait,Sir.

...and ,yes,I took your advice very seriously so I was busy in some other projects to build some devices for the benefit of humankind and solve some biggest problems in tech and engineering.

To answer your question, my understanding is that free energy of this kind is possible, based on my experiments most of them recent and one of them dating back to Sept 2000. The most promising functional variation so far is my particular leverage class of devices, which has been shown to have a window of perhaps typically 0.25X to 2.5X the mass of the ball being moved. It indeed uses a balance-type structure, typically with a counterweight on the shorter end, with motion on the long end beginning in an upward-directed fashion, with the small ball being supported almost horizontally during the upward motion. During the downwards motion, the small ball is unsupported by the slope, using its full weight against the lever, and used to lift the counterweight again using leverage. On Oct 11, 2018 I considered this principle fully-proved as I knew that full and automatic upwards-and-downwards motion takes place, and the energy necessary for lateral transitions is sometimes negligible depending on construction. There are 12 or more proven variations on my leverage class of devices using similar arguments.

The maximum return of such a device is perhaps always

Who?

Please stop spending your valuable time by trying to realize the impossible since there is no such thing in real life. French Academy forbids, since 1860, French scientists to put more time on that. You remind me of an inventor who came to my office to announce that he solved the world energy problem by gaining the energy of the floating boxes in his swimming pool after draining out the water. Something fishy is always hidden in these things.