Alexander, as I said the Hubble parameter has been determined in the fits of Planck, WMAP, Atacama and others without reference to supernovae. Every honest scientist is doing the best analysis possible of his data.  Nielsen, Guffanti and Sarkar (arXiv: 1506.01354 [astro-ph.CO] find that supernova data do not prove that the expansion is accelerating, but the Universe is certainly not static..

Mohamed,

My comment was to Alexander Chepchick, not toyou. Sorry for the confusion.

Dear Prof. El Naschie, 

My work is connected with almost contact B-metric manifolds. In one of my manuscripts - "SPACE-LIKE AND TIME-LIKE HYPERSPHERES IN REAL PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN 4-SPACES WITH ALMOST CONTACT B-METRIC STRUCTURES", there are considered 4-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian spaces with inner products of signature (3,1) and (2,2). The objects of investigation are space-like and time-like hyperspheres in the respective cases. These hypersurfaces are equipped with almost contact B-metric structures. The constructed manifolds are characterized geometrically. 

In this work we consider space-like and time-like hyperspheres in $\R^{3,1}$ and $\R^{2,2}$, known also as 3-dimensional de Sitter and anti-de Sitter space-times. Our goal is to construct almost contact B-metric manifolds on these hypersurfaces and to study their geometrical properties. These explicit examples contribute for the study of the considered manifolds in the lowest dimension. 

I wanted to connect my results and my field of work with well-known structures as 3-dimensional de Sitter and anti-de Sitter space-times. 

If you could give me some additional advice for my future works how can I integrate my work in may be some issues in physics I will be very gratefull.

Best wishes, 

Hristo