Hi there

I have used it for cross-sectional, using a modified version. See this link http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1471-2458-13-154-s3.doc&rct=j&frm=1&q=&esrc=s&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiN5OL2suTLAhUj2qYKHVzdDJwQFggZMAA&usg=AFQjCNF4cUzs2QLQMrFnz9bu6AnTWpokog

Thank you very much for this responce David, unfortunatelly for some reason I can not follow the above link you provide, shall you write the title of the study ?

Hi there

The link isn't to my study (mine isn't published yet) but to the modified version that I used. The study that it came from was called “Are Healthcare Workers’ Intentions to Vaccinate Related to their Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes? A Systematic Review”.

Here's the link to that full paper

http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-154

Thank you very much!

Hi,

Checkout the link and attachments for methodological quality assessment tools for cross-sectional studies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK35156/

Thank you very much for this Dr Schmidt and Dr Durg... I was wondering whether anyone knows how to interpret the score provided by Crombie's items once the quality assessment is already done? All the best...

Carlos

A modified version of NOS has been developed, giving a maximum of 5 stars for selection, 2 stars for comparability and 3 stars for outcome.

For further details, please refer to S1 of the study: Article Panethnic Differences in Blood Pressure in Europe: A Systema...

Thank you very much for this! I'll have a look into it...

All the best,

Carlos