I would like to know whether AI tools like ChatGPT can publish high quality research work in reputed scopus indexed (peer-reviewed) journals much better than human's research quality.
AI can analyze data quickly and accurately, but it relies on humans for guidance and interpretation of results. Collaboration between AI and humans is best for scientific research.
AI can analyze data with high efficiency and accuracy, but humans are better to guide and interpret the results. The best solution is cooperation between the two parties for scientific research
There are daunting times where writing is lofty and humans can use assistance. An example is in accreditation, grant or justification writing. When a student makes a research paper that is supposed to be their original work then NO, that plagiarism, with penalties up to and including expulsion.
AI is used in medical statistics for example. But a misdiagnosis is not to be blamed on AI, but a human, trained in medical practice...
Another example: AI decides the direction you should travel on a map. You (human) decide on the path to take. Maybe you can offer AI a correction if you find an obstacle...
AI can help researchers by quickly analyzing data and finding patterns. It can even help write parts of research papers. However, humans are better at coming up with new ideas, understanding complex details, and making sure the research is important and ethical. So, while AI makes research faster and more accurate, humans are still needed for creativity and deep understanding.