Sorry, I do not agree with it now. The functions of Thomson Reuters and RG are entirely different. If RG ensures strict QC then may be it can be a good one rather than alternative. Still it seems to me as a social media for sharing research activities, findings, articles, thoughts and so on with a huge collections of resources including members.

Maintaining QC and indexing parameters are far beyond. However, thanks for a nice question indeed.

Sorry, I do not agree with it now. The functions of Thomson Reuters and RG are entirely different. If RG ensures strict QC then may be it can be a good one rather than alternative. Still it seems to me as a social media for sharing research activities, findings, articles, thoughts and so on with a huge collections of resources including members.

Maintaining QC and indexing parameters are far beyond. However, thanks for a nice question indeed.

Present system of Journal Indexing, Journal Ranking, Citation calculation by RG is based on the publications uploaded on RG only. Yes, it 'CAN' be better if RG broaden this system considering QC at the same time as mentioned by Dear Rahman.

Hello,

I think that Researchgate pursues different goals; however, the whole program can be directed towards indexing as well. Why not?

Best regards,

R. Biria

Yes , I agree too

RG is one of the world's top influential academic platforms. It can be the best in indexing of academic papers, better and finer than Thomas Reuters

I agree with Dr. Md. Mostafizur Rahman

yes, I agree

My answer is No!

Research Gate can not become an alternative or better than Thomson Reuters as:

Objectives of both are different.

Yes. researchgate is better than thoson reuters ,

I agree with dr. Gupta

Hi

Sorry, I do not thing that, because the functions of RG and Thomson Reuters is deeply different.

regards

yes I agree

The functions of RG and Thomson Reuters is entirely different.