Recently, I published two new spider species in Forests and registered two new species in Zoobank after the paper was published.

However, the World Spider Catalog currently contains the following. https://wsc.nmbe.ch/refincluded/17040

  • Jang, C. M., Yoo, J. S., Kim, S. T. & Bae, Y. S. (2023). Rocky area inhabiting daddy long-legs spiders, Pholcus Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Pholcidae) in mountainous mixed forests. Forests 14(538): 1-8. [N.B.: this is an electronic journal and the Zoobank registration is missing, see ICZN Article 8.5.3; therefore the two described species are not valid.] doi:10.3390/f14030538
  • Pholcus deokjeok: 3, f. 2a-j (mf, nomen nudum, Zoobank registration in this electronic journal is missing, see ICZN Article 8.5.3)
  • Pholcus gangneung: 5, f. 3a-j (mf, nomen nudum, Zoobank registration in this electronic journal is missing, see ICZN Article 8.5.3)

I knew what regulations I violated. Since this journal is an electronic journal, it should have been registered and specified before publication or in publication.

I want to reinstated zoological nomen nudum (invalid name) to be valid. But I don't know the procedure how to solve this.

While writing a simple paper with a list format, I want to know if I register these two new species in Zoobank again, simply present the LSID number (newly registered number, not original), and explain why it became nomen nudum by giving the rev. stat., stat. revalid., or sp. revalid. with species name.

I would greatly appreciate it if someone could let me know if there is anything I can do to make these two species as valid species not a nomen nudum.

I look forward to someone's positive response.

Thanks for reading.

More Chang-Moon Jang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions